Lucas v. Astrue

Filing 17

ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendations, the Commissioner's final decision is affirmed, denying 10 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 13 Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment, and this case is stricken from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 2/25/14. (eot)

Download PDF
ct soFFl u s pl x uRr zce sm A RFIi tV o' T oV D A M l ' C : FEB 25 2 1 29 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ES TERN DI TRI OF VI NI S CT RGI A J I UL B : E. Y ,J>RK ' u f , > e ! ROANOKE DI I O N V SI CYNTHI ROBERTSON LUCAS, A Pl ntf, ai if v. CAROLYN W .COLVI N, CommisonerofSocalSec iy, si i urt Dee fndant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ci lAc i No.7:2- 00582 vi ton 1 CV- FI NAL ORDER By: Samue G.W is n l lo Unie St esDiti Judge t d at srct Thsc s wa r fre pu s a tt 2 U. C.j6 6b ()B)t teHo o a l Ro etS i a e s eerd ru n o 8 S. 3 () 1( o h n rb e b r . Bal Unie Stt sM a sr eJ lou, td a e gitat udge.TheM a sr t J gitae udgehasll d ar por r co me ng ie e t e m ndi t a a o d rb e tr dg a tn teCo sine ' moinf rs mmayj d me ta dd nyng h t n r e e ne e rn ig h mmiso rs t o u r u g n n e i o t ep an ifsmoin frsl r u g n .Ob e to st terpo t n r c mme d to h v h litf' to o l mmayj d me t j cin o h e r a d e o n ai n a e no be n fl a t c tupon r e ofpe tne pori oft r c d, soft opi on t t t e ied nd he our, eviw ri nt tons he e or i he ni ha t r po ts d be ado e he e r houl pt d. A cc di y,i i O R DER ED a AD JU D G ED t tt Re ta Re om m e i or ngl t s nd ha he por nd c ndaton ( ketNo.1 i ADOPTED,t Commisone ' fnalde soni AFFI ED,he Doc 6) s he si rs i cii s RM t plitf smo inf rs mmayj d me ( c e No. 0 i DENI teCo sin rs an if to o u r u g nt Do k t 1 ) s ED,h mmiso e ' motonf sl r udg nt( ke No.1 i GRANTED,a t sca ei STRI i or lmmayj me Doc t 3) s nd hi s s CKEN f o t docke oft cour . r m he t he t 7 z' .r ' . E NTER : Fe ua y 25, 4. br r 201 . e#' ' ' . ,5 ' , . g' , i ' /, , . > ., , ,. UNI TED STA TES D I STRI J G E CT UD ! !

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?