Paris v. Astrue
Filing
18
FINAL ORDER denying plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Commissioner's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 02/10/2014. (rkc)
CLERK' OFFI t . . ST O URT
S
CE ) DI .
S
AT ROANOKE,
VA
FI ED
L
FE l2 2 1
B
24
I TH E UN I
N
TED STA TES D I
STR I CO U R T
CT
FO R TH E W E STER N D I
STR I T O F V I G I I
C
R N A
ROANOKE DI I O N
V SI
JULA C.
I DUDL , ERK
EY CL
BK
F
JU LI N P.PAR I
AN
S,
C i lAc i N o.7: 2- V vi t on
1 C 00596
Pl ntf ,
ai if
FI A L O R DER
N
CA R O LY N W .CO LV I ,Ac i
N
t ng
C om m i s oner ofSoc alSe ur t
si
i
c iy,
By: Sa ue G.W is n
m l
lo
Uni St esD i ri Judge
ted at
st ct
D ef ndant
e
.
Thi c ewasr erdpurua t 28U. C.j636( ()B)t t Honorbl Robe tS.
s as
efre s nt o
S.
b) 1( o he
a e
r
Bal u, t d Stt M a sr t J
lo Unit a es gitae udge. TheM a sr t J
gitae udgeha fld a r por r ommendi
s ie e t ec
ng
t a a o d rbee trdg a tn teCo si n rsmoi nfrs mmayj d me t ndd n ig
h t n re
ne e rn ig h mmiso e ' to o u r u g n a e yn
t ep an ifsmoin f rs mma yj d me t Obe to st t rp r a drc mme d to h v
h litf
to o u r u g n . j cin o he e o t n e o n ain a e
no be fl a t c t u r vi w ofpe tnen pori oft r cor i oft opi ont t
t en ied nd he our, pon t e
ri t tons he e d, s he ni ha
t r por s d be a ed.
he e t houl
dopt
Ac or ngl i i ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt Re ta Rec
c di y, t s
nd
ha he por nd omm e ton
nda i
( ke No.1 i ADOPTED,t Commiso rsfna decso i AFFI ED,t
Doc t
7) s
he
sine ' i l iin s
RM
he
plitf moinf rs mmayj d me t Do k tNo 1 )i DENI t Co si n rs
anifs to o u r u g n ( c e . 0 s
ED,he mmiso e'
mo inf rs mma yj d me t( c e No.1 )i GRANTED, ndt i c s i S CKEN
to o u r u g n Do k t
2 s
a h s a e s TRI
)M
.g
'
f om t doc toft c t
r he ke
he our .
''
'
EN TER : Fe u y 1 201
br ar 0, 4.
zL -x
x
.
'
,'
'
.
L I STATES DI CT J
X TED
STRI UDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?