Smith v. Owens et al
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60 ; Objections 65 are OVERRULED; Objections 61 are OVERRULED; and judgment is in favor of the defendants Officer Owens, Officer Dixon, and Lieutenant Carico, and against the plaintiff Brandon Jerod Smith; this case is ORDERED STRICKEN from the court's docket. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 12/18/2013. (tvt)
CL K' OF I u. olxpnl
ER S FCE s s . I
*
A q A o ,A
z' N l v
o
Fl
r
uso
I TH E U N I
N
TED STATE S D I
STR I C O U RT
CT
FO R TH E W E STER N D I
STR I O F VI G I A
CT
R NI
R O A N O K E D I SI N
W O
DEC 13 2 1
03
a A .
uul
EM
BY:
B M ND O N JER O D SM ITH ,
C i lA c i N o.7: V00060
vi t on
13C
Pl nt f ,
ai i f
V.
FI
NAL ORDER
O FFI ER O W EN S,e aI,
C
t .
By: Sam ue G .W is
l
l on
U ni e St esD i t i tJudge
t d at
src
D ef
endant
s.
Th sc s wa r fre p s a tt 28U. C. 6 6b ()B)t t eHo o a l Pn l M .
i a e s e erd uru n o
S. j 3 ()1 ( o h n rb e mea
Sa ge , t d Stt sM a sr t J
r nt Unie a e
gita e udge.TheM a sr t J
gita e udgehel a e de i r he rng o
d n vi nta y a i n
S ptmb r1 , 01 a ha fldarpo t e o ndngt a t ec u t n e j d me ti fvo
e e e 9 2 3 nd s ie e r r c mme i h t h o r e tr u g n n a r
o t ed fn a t.Do ke le No. 0. Th os p an if Brn o J r d S t , a o j ce
f h e e d n s ( c t tm
6 ) epr e litf, a d n eo mih h s be td
t t r por , os l r i i i s s ofwines c e biiy t the e t r a es e orha t
o he e t m ty a s ng s ue
t s r di lt ha
ihe ddr s d
d he
o p rt t t a d e sa t h ai g.Do k tle No. ) mihh sas o j ce t te
p o t y o d rs the e rn ( c e tm
mi
65 .S t a lo b e td o h
M a sr t J
gi ta e udge' or r ofN ove be 1 201 t de e Sm ih' pos - a i m oton t
s de
m r 9, 3 hat ni d
t s the rng
i o
r vi r d eyevi ,1de e hi f rh moton f a nt
e ew api
deo ni d s ou t
i or ppoi mentofc ms lza gr nt t
ot e , nd a ed he
d fn n s moi nfrap o e tv o de b ri f rh rds o e y ( c t tm No 61)
ee da t' to o r tcie r r arng u te ic v r .Do ke le
. .
Ha n rv e dterp r,h No e r1 , 01 Or e, mi so j ci n t eeo pet e t
vig e iwe h e o tt e v mbe 9 2 3 d r S t b e to s h rt , ri n
h'
n
1Thedefnda smant nt ypr edt r pi e vi a t Se ember1 , 201 hea i
e nt i ai he oduc he a d ye deo t he pt
9
3 rng.
2S t as rie hi lc o c u e i hi o jcin t teMa itaeJ g ' rp r.Asst u i teMa srt
mi lo asd s ak f o nsln s b eto s o h gsrt ud es e o t e o tn h gitae
h
J d esod rd n n S t sfrt to t a p it o nslDo k tIe No 21, rs n r h v n sauo y
u g ' r e eyig mi is moin o p on c u e ( c e tm . )p io es a e o tttr
h'
rghtt co e i cvi c e I t a t cour ha dic ein ast whet rt r s t a at ne rpr s ta
i o uns l n i l as s. nse d,he
t s s r to
o
he o eque t hat n tor y e e en
p ro u bet afr c t e. 8U. C. 1 l ()l.Th Ma itaeJ g c n iee tefcsa d
es n na l o fo d omsl2 S. j 9 5e() e gsrt ud e o sd rd h a t n
cru tn e o S t sc s a fu iwa n tnteitrs o j siet rq etc u e frS t ( e
ic msa c s f mi ae nd o nd t s o i h neet f utc o e u s o nslo mih.S e
h'
Do k tIe No 21( oigu c mpiae fcu l n lg lsu sa S t sd mo srtda lt t a e u tl
c e tm . n t n o lctd at a a d e a ise nd mi e n tae bi y o d q aey
n
h'
i
rp ee thsitrss. l a dto , rve o t e ie c so t M a itaeJ g wa mo tcrf lnh r
e rsn i neetl) n d i n a e iw fhe vd n e h wshe gsrt ud e s s aeu i e
i
e m i tonoft e ier co d,wasbot pai ta i g w ih Sm ih i gi nghi evey opporuniy t
xa nai
he ntr e r
h ten nd ndulent t
t n vi m
x
t t o
pr s nthi cm e and,at
ee s s,
lhoughnotSmih' advoc t ,wa pe sse i he eforst de o t r or i acaef
ts
a e s r itnt n r f t o velp he ec d n r ul
a appr it ma rs ht tSmih' cli we ea quaeypr s nt See e. ,
nd
oprae nne uc ha
t s ams r de tl e e ed. , a.Bowma v. hie, F.
n W t 388 2d
7 6, 61(t Ci.1 6 )
5 7 4h r 9 8.
pori oft r c ddenov andt r e
tons he e or
o,
he elvantl t c t e wih t M a sr t J
aw,he our agr es t he gita e udge'
s
rc mme d to t e tr u g n i fv ro ted fn a t a dh rNo e r1 , 3
e o n ain o n e j d me tn a o f h ee d ns n e v mbe 9 201
nli .
lngs
Acc di y,i i he e O RDERED a ADJUDGED t :
or ngl t s r by
nd
hat
1 t M a srt J
) he gitae udge' Re t ndRe omme ton( ke Ie No.60 i
s por a
c
ndai Doc t tm
)s
AD O PTED ;
2 Smi sObe to st Re o t n Re o n ain( c e Ie No. 5 a e
) t
h' j ci n o p r a d c mme d to Do k t tm
6) r
O V ERR U LED ;
3 S t sObe to st Ma itaeJ d esOr e ( c t tm No 61 ae
) mi
h' j cin o gsrt u g ' d r Do ke Ie . ) r
O V ERR U LED ;K d
4 j d me ti e trd i fv ro t d fn a t Ofie Owe s Ofie Dio a
) u g n s n ee n a o f he ee d n s fc r n , fc r x n, nd
Liut na Ca i o,andagans t pl ntf Br ndon J r Smih.
e e nt rc
i t he ai if a
e od
t
A1 m a tr ha ng bee r ol t sca e i ORDERED STRI
1 te s vi
n es ved, hi s s
CKEN fom t cou tsdoc t
r he r'
ke .
TheCl r i DI
e k s RECTED t mai a c oft sor rt t pl i if
o l opy hi de o he antf
'
X
s
z'
.
.
E NTER : Thi D e e be 18h 201 .
s cm r t
3
'
V,'
=
UNI
TED STATESDI CT JUDGE
STRI
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?