Ingram v. Clark et al
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 04/12/2013. (kab)
et : oFFl u, . sm cotr
mv
cE s nl
l
A R 1rkr ,A
T 9 ''u v
),r )
'
n
.( .
r
I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT
N
TED
S CT
AP 12 2 j
j
gJ
FO R T H E W ESTERN D I
STR I T O F VI G I A
C
R NI
R O AN O K E DIV ISIO N
JUQi , .y ' ERK
l
sx A C.i' t 2fcu
,
.
.
DEP
JA M ES R AN DO LPH I G R AM ,
N
Pl ntf
ai if,
LERK
C i lA c i n N o.7: c 00091
vi t o
13- vM EM O M ND U M O PI O N
NI
V.
CL AR K ,ET A L,
By: Chi fJudge G l n E.C onrad
e
e
Chi fU nied St e D i t i Judge
e
t
at s s r ct
Dee n t)
fnda ts.
J m esR a ph I a ,pr ee ng pr K , ie a c vi r g scom pl i , s ntt 42
n
ndol ngr m oc di
o f l d i l i ht
a nt pur ua o
U. C.j 1 .By Or re ee 3/ / 3,t c tdiecedpl nift s twihi 1
S.
983
de ntr d 20201 he our r t aitf o ubmi t n 0
da f om t da e oft Or r a i a e a ountf za a c ri d copy ofhi t u tf
ys r he t
he de n nm t cc
ona nd e tfe
s r s und
a ountsa e e f t sx- ont pe i pr c ng t flng oft com pl i . Pl i ifwas
cc
t t m nt or he i m h r od e edi he ii
he
a nt a ntf
a vie ta af ilet c mpywo dr s l i d s sa o ti a to wih u p eu ie
d s d h t alr o o l ul e ut n imisl f h s cin t o t rj dc .
t
M or t n 1 da ha ea ed,a pl n ifhasf ie t co pl wih t de c i d
e ha 0 ys ve lps nd aitf
al d o m y t he s rbe
c tonsbec us t s i t r quese fnanc a doc e a i Ac di y, hec t
ondii
a e o ubm t he e t d i i l um ntton. cor ngl t our
d s se t ea to wi u p eu iea dsrk st ec s fo tea tv d c e o t ec u t
imis s h cin t t rj dc n tie h a e r m h cie o k t f h o r.
ho
Pl n ifm a r iet cli i a s par t a ton onc pli ifi pr pa e t c
aitf y efl he a ms n e ae c i
e antf s e r d o ompl wih t
y t he
not c tons
ed ondii .
The Cl r i die t d t s nd a c oft s M e or ndum Opi on a ac m pa ng
ek s rce o e
opy hi m a
ni nd co nyi
Or t pl i if
der o antf
rs
h
EN TER : ' i
t M dyo- rl2 1 .
1
a t i 03
Ap ,
Chi fUnie St t D i ti tJ
e
t d a es s r c udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?