Blocker v. Warden et al
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 04/25/2013. (rkc)
clEM s OFFI U..DI . COURT
CE s ST
AT ROANOG ,V
A
F'
LED
AF 25 2 1
R
23
I THE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRICT CO URT
FO R T H E W E STER N DIST m CT O F V I G I I
R N A
ROANO KE DI SI
VI ON
M ARVI BLO CK ER,
N
J A C.
ULI DUDL CLERK
EY
BK
r
'
N
Ci lA c i No.7: 3c
vi ton
1 v00103
Pl nt f ,
ai i f
M EM ORANDUM OPI
NION
V.
W A R D EN etaI,
.
D efendants
.
By:Sam uelG .W ison
l
Unie St e Dit i tJudge
t d at s s r c
Pl n ifM a v n Bl ker aVigi ai ae pr e ngrr s brng t saci plr ua
aitf r i oc , r ni nm t oc edi
o e, i s hi ton zs nt
t 42U. C.j1 a i tt l e oye o W atnsli Stt Prs Bl ke ha
o
S.
983 gans weve mpl es f le kdge ae ion. oc r s
s p e ne hsic mpeej1 3c mpan-o m wiht n yt pa e o j u n l nre
u plme td i n o lt 98 o li tf r t we t -wo g s f o r a e tis
t tge r l de c i how prs e pl sa econ n i tng hi a r a t s ts a t r f l
ha ne aly s rbe
ion m oyee r
t m na i
s le dy-m a if c o y ood,
se ln h sma a i e a dohe malc lighm o j cin bl n me , ho tn t dsu bhs
taig i g zn s n t r i, aln i be to a e n s s u ig o it r i
se p, r f sng t pr dehi gre nc f nns
l e and e u i o ovi m ' va e o .
i
Under28U. C.j1 A,dit tco ' aerquie t rviw prs rc ant f
S. 915 sdc uts r e rd o e e ione ompli s or
t
c
ompla ewih t bascnzesofpl a ng,a i doi s t c tmus eihe %i ntf
inc t he i l
e di nd n ng o, he our
t t r çde iy
c za e c am sordim ist co pl nt ora pori oft c
ogni bl l i
s s he m ai , ny ton he ompli ,i t c
ant f he ompli ...
ant
fist saeacam u o whc r l f yb g a td' j 1 5 b .A c mp an mu talg
al o tt li p n ih ei ma e rn e . 91 A( ) o lit s le e
e
'
t noug f t t sae ac am t r le t ti plusbl on isf e. Gi ra a v.J on,5
t
e
h ac s o t t l i o e if ha s a i e t ac ' a r t no ohns
'
21
F. 298,302( hCi. )( i BelAt.Co . Two y,55 U. 544,570( )
3d
4t r 2008 quotng l l p v. mbl 0 S.
2007).
The f mii r esofpl a ng a egr a l r a d f pr s pli if ,howeve , nd ltga s
n lar ul
e di r e ty elxe oï o e antfs
r a ii nt
w ih m ert i cl m s s d notbe st i by t
t
iorous ai houl
ym ed
echni requiem ent See B eaudet v.Civ
cal
r
s.
t
t
'Bl ke co pl nst thi m e l ofe i udeol c bba ,under ke br d a c e ,t s al
oc r m ai ha s as tn ncl
d a ge
coo d ea nd ookis oo-m l
pi esofc ke,s piiuss lng cofee si pott s bea andrc t thavebee ûplye wihy a vmio
ec
a us co -meli
f , lmy
oe , ns
ie ha
n t a d t ' nd
'
us
bodiyfui
l l ds.
t
w
o Hn t n 7 5F.d 1 4,1 7 -7 (t Ci. 98 ) Silt rlx to o tepla igr ls
f mp o , 7 2 27 2 7 8 4h r 1 5 . tl,he ea ain f h e dn ue
i notwihoutlmis A cour mus, tam i m um,bea et dic r fom t compl i t
s
t
i t.
t ta
ni
bl o s e n r he
ant he
pa te beng s a t al ge c
ris i ued nd he le d onduc on whih e c cai r t . Though r l xe t
t
c a h l m ess
e a d, he
sa d r si d ma d g n rlc h r n e a di d e no rq iec u t Goc n u eu q e to
tn ad tl e n s e ea o e e c , n t o s t e ur o rs ç o j r p u sins
l
t
ne rs ey pr e t d t t m . I a 1
ve quar l es n e o he ' d. t 278.
'
Hee( wih hi prvi co ait)Bl ke hasalege anumbe ofwr but
r as t s e ous mpl n2 oc r
l d
r
ongs
of e ed s ntf c uals ppor f t ,l r l f l d t co c a pa tc a w r ng t a
f r ca a t u
t or hem a ge y aie o nne t ny r i ul r o o ny
pa tc a def nt ne e t t gr md hi c
riulr enda , gl ced o ot
s ompl n on a consiutonalorsaut y
ait ny
tt i
t t or
pr son,a r quese no s c fcr i f W hiet pladi r l do noti
ovii nd e t d
pe ii ele .
l he e ng ues
mpos a e tng
e n xaci
sa r on Bl ke ,hem us ofe s
t nda d
oc r
t f r omef hol on whih t de enda sca ba ea a we or
oot d
c he f nt n s n ns r
o wh c t ec u t a ba eaj d me t Ac o dngy tec u t imis sBlc e ' c mplit
n ih h o r c n s u g n . c r i l ,h o r d s se o k rs o an
wih u p eudc frfit et saeacam.
t o t rj ie o all o tt li
r
EN TER :A prl25, 3.
i
201
..
):
.:
('
r
1
'po ,'7
V .,'
>
. '
.
y.
'
F ',
'
.
.
7
'
'
z.
..
A
UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI J
CT UDGE
2Se Bl ke v. Vh ni SaeP io Ofkil. . S. , 1 c 0 0 ( . Va Jn r 2 , 01 )
e oc r
xi a tt r,n t as W R. P.7:3 v 0 27 W D. .a uay 4 2 3.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?