Blocker v. Warden et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 04/25/2013. (rkc)

Download PDF
clEM s OFFI U..DI . COURT CE s ST AT ROANOG ,V A F' LED AF 25 2 1 R 23 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRICT CO URT FO R T H E W E STER N DIST m CT O F V I G I I R N A ROANO KE DI SI VI ON M ARVI BLO CK ER, N J A C. ULI DUDL CLERK EY BK r ' N Ci lA c i No.7: 3c vi ton 1 v00103 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM ORANDUM OPI NION V. W A R D EN etaI, . D efendants . By:Sam uelG .W ison l Unie St e Dit i tJudge t d at s s r c Pl n ifM a v n Bl ker aVigi ai ae pr e ngrr s brng t saci plr ua aitf r i oc , r ni nm t oc edi o e, i s hi ton zs nt t 42U. C.j1 a i tt l e oye o W atnsli Stt Prs Bl ke ha o S. 983 gans weve mpl es f le kdge ae ion. oc r s s p e ne hsic mpeej1 3c mpan-o m wiht n yt pa e o j u n l nre u plme td i n o lt 98 o li tf r t we t -wo g s f o r a e tis t tge r l de c i how prs e pl sa econ n i tng hi a r a t s ts a t r f l ha ne aly s rbe ion m oyee r t m na i s le dy-m a if c o y ood, se ln h sma a i e a dohe malc lighm o j cin bl n me , ho tn t dsu bhs taig i g zn s n t r i, aln i be to a e n s s u ig o it r i se p, r f sng t pr dehi gre nc f nns l e and e u i o ovi m ' va e o . i Under28U. C.j1 A,dit tco ' aerquie t rviw prs rc ant f S. 915 sdc uts r e rd o e e ione ompli s or t c ompla ewih t bascnzesofpl a ng,a i doi s t c tmus eihe %i ntf inc t he i l e di nd n ng o, he our t t r çde iy c za e c am sordim ist co pl nt ora pori oft c ogni bl l i s s he m ai , ny ton he ompli ,i t c ant f he ompli ... ant fist saeacam u o whc r l f yb g a td' j 1 5 b .A c mp an mu talg al o tt li p n ih ei ma e rn e . 91 A( ) o lit s le e e ' t noug f t t sae ac am t r le t ti plusbl on isf e. Gi ra a v.J on,5 t e h ac s o t t l i o e if ha s a i e t ac ' a r t no ohns ' 21 F. 298,302( hCi. )( i BelAt.Co . Two y,55 U. 544,570( ) 3d 4t r 2008 quotng l l p v. mbl 0 S. 2007). The f mii r esofpl a ng a egr a l r a d f pr s pli if ,howeve , nd ltga s n lar ul e di r e ty elxe oï o e antfs r a ii nt w ih m ert i cl m s s d notbe st i by t t iorous ai houl ym ed echni requiem ent See B eaudet v.Civ cal r s. t t 'Bl ke co pl nst thi m e l ofe i udeol c bba ,under ke br d a c e ,t s al oc r m ai ha s as tn ncl d a ge coo d ea nd ookis oo-m l pi esofc ke,s piiuss lng cofee si pott s bea andrc t thavebee ûplye wihy a vmio ec a us co -meli f , lmy oe , ns ie ha n t a d t ' nd ' us bodiyfui l l ds. t w o Hn t n 7 5F.d 1 4,1 7 -7 (t Ci. 98 ) Silt rlx to o tepla igr ls f mp o , 7 2 27 2 7 8 4h r 1 5 . tl,he ea ain f h e dn ue i notwihoutlmis A cour mus, tam i m um,bea et dic r fom t compl i t s t i t. t ta ni bl o s e n r he ant he pa te beng s a t al ge c ris i ued nd he le d onduc on whih e c cai r t . Though r l xe t t c a h l m ess e a d, he sa d r si d ma d g n rlc h r n e a di d e no rq iec u t Goc n u eu q e to tn ad tl e n s e ea o e e c , n t o s t e ur o rs ç o j r p u sins l t ne rs ey pr e t d t t m . I a 1 ve quar l es n e o he ' d. t 278. ' Hee( wih hi prvi co ait)Bl ke hasalege anumbe ofwr but r as t s e ous mpl n2 oc r l d r ongs of e ed s ntf c uals ppor f t ,l r l f l d t co c a pa tc a w r ng t a f r ca a t u t or hem a ge y aie o nne t ny r i ul r o o ny pa tc a def nt ne e t t gr md hi c riulr enda , gl ced o ot s ompl n on a consiutonalorsaut y ait ny tt i t t or pr son,a r quese no s c fcr i f W hiet pladi r l do noti ovii nd e t d pe ii ele . l he e ng ues mpos a e tng e n xaci sa r on Bl ke ,hem us ofe s t nda d oc r t f r omef hol on whih t de enda sca ba ea a we or oot d c he f nt n s n ns r o wh c t ec u t a ba eaj d me t Ac o dngy tec u t imis sBlc e ' c mplit n ih h o r c n s u g n . c r i l ,h o r d s se o k rs o an wih u p eudc frfit et saeacam. t o t rj ie o all o tt li r EN TER :A prl25, 3. i 201 .. ): .: (' r 1 'po ,'7 V .,' > . ' . y. ' F ', ' . . 7 ' ' z. .. A UNI TED STATES DI STRI J CT UDGE 2Se Bl ke v. Vh ni SaeP io Ofkil. . S. , 1 c 0 0 ( . Va Jn r 2 , 01 ) e oc r xi a tt r,n t as W R. P.7:3 v 0 27 W D. .a uay 4 2 3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?