Dalton v. Colvin
Filing
22
ORDER denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 21 Report and Recommendations in its entirety, that the Commissioner's final decision is affirmed, and that this matter is striken from the active docket of this court. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/31/14. (mka)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HARRISONBURG DIVISION
LOURA MECHELLE DALTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.: 7:13cv00136
By: Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
ORDER
This matter was referred to the Honorable Robert S. Ballou, United States Magistrate Judge,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition.
The Magistrate Judge filed a report and recommendation on July 8, 2014, recommending that the
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied, the Commissioner’s motion for summary
judgment be granted, and the Commissioner’s final decision be affirmed. No objections to the
report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and
recommendation should be adopted in its entirety. It is accordingly ORDERED and
ADJUDGED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is DENIED, that
the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 15) is GRANTED, that the report
and recommendation (Dkt. No. 21) is ADOPTED in its entirety, that the Commissioner’s final
decision is AFFIRMED, and that this matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.
The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
Entered: July 31, 2014
/s/ Michael F. Urbanski
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?