Carroll v. Barker
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 01/03/2014. (kab)
Q Fe 6OF I U. Dl : tr
@
.
FW S. :7 X l
ATROANOKE,
VA
F!f:
l'.
-- :
-
J
Ad 3 gj
1
I THE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FOR THE W ESTERN DI
STRI OF VI
CT
RGI A
NI
ROANOKE DI I ON
V SI
CHARLESELLERSON CARRO LL, .
IR.
JULI C. - f CL
A
' , ERK
#
BY;
.
DEP
CLERK
CASE NO.7: 4CV00005
1
Pl i i f
a nt f ,
M EM OM NDUM OPI ON
NI
C/ BARKER
O
By: Gl n E.Conr
e
ad
Chi Uni St esD i ri Judge
ef ted at
st ct
D ef
endant.
Cha s Ele s Ca r l J . a Vigi a i ae pr e ng pr K ,fl d tls c vi rght
de lr on rol, r,
r ni nm t oc edi
o
ie li i l i s
a i purua t 42U. C.j 1 algi t onNovembe 25,201 t dee
cton s nt o
S.
983, le ng hat
r
3,he fndantprs
ion
ofke r f s d t pr de hi wih hi s pe mea,be aus Ca r lha notr blne hi l h
f r e u e o ovi
m t s up r
l c e rol d
e r d s unc
ta asr quie Upo r vi oft r co d,t c tfndst tt aci m us be sl a iy
ry
e r d.
n e ew
he e r he our i
ha he ton
t
lmm rl
dim is a fi ous
s sed s rvol .
The c ti r quied t dimi sa prs rsc vi a ton a i ta go r
our s e r o s s
ione ' i l c i gans
ve nmen a ofk e i
tl t r f
t ta ton i fi ous ma ii ,o f ist s e a cai on whi r le m a be g a e 28
ha c i s rvol , lc ous r al o ut l m
ch e if y
r ntd.
U.. j 1 5 b ( ) S c sauo y a to iy t ds s acam a fioo sal wstec u t
SC. 91 A( )1. u h tt tr uh rt o imis li s rv lu lo h o r
Go ds s acam b s do a id s u a l meils lg l h o y (r fc t lc n e to s(h t
l imis li a e n n n ip tby rte s e a t e r o ) a tz o tni n t al
t
a
aece ryb s ls . Netk v. iln , 9 U. 31 , 2 ( 98 )
r lal a ee s' i e W l ms 4 0 S. 9 3 7 1 9 .
' z
i
To pr t tt om f ra e or e n ha s prs c tons vi a e hi consiutonal
ove ha mc o tbl
ve r h ion ondii
olt d s
tt i
rg t, prs n rmu tl r d c e d n eo as ro o sg iia t y ia o e to a ij r
ihs a io e s รง o u e vie c f eius r i nfc n ph sc l r mo in l nu y
p
r s t fo t c le g d c n iinl1' S a k v S t,71F.d 1 2 1 6 ( t Ci.1 9 )
eulng r m he haln e o dto . h k a . mi
i
5
h
3 6 , 6 4h r 9 5 .
Car l f l t al s f rng a hn m wha s ve fom m isng one m e . M o e r a
r ol ais o lege ufe i ny r
t oe r r
si
al
r ove , s
Cmw l' o r f a t f l prs pr edlr c us d t al ge de i ton, he ha no
ls wn e us l o olow ion oc ze a e he le d prva i
s
f c t lba i t bl t ofkerf a vi ai ofhi rght Fort r as sa e t cour
a tz s s o ame he t
a
or ny olton
s i s.
he e ons t t d, he
t
fn sn c nsiuina i iainshee a d ds s e Car l' c mpan wi o tp eu ie
i d o o t to l mpl to r , n imis s ro ls o lit t u rj dc ,
t
c
h
p ts a tt j 1 5 b ( ) a fioo .
t u n o 91 A( )1, s rv lus
r
The Clr i dieced t s nd c e oft s me or ndum opi on and a co pa ng
e k s r t o e opi s
hi m a
ni
c m nyi
o dert pl i if
r o antf
ENTER:Ths % u d yo J n ay, 2014.
i ' a f aur
Chi Unie St t Diti J
ef t d aes srct udge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?