Wells v. Mirrett
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 02/11/2014. (kab)
* * œ: OFFI U. DI O URT
CE S. SX
AT BOANOKE,
VA
2) ;.
:t :7 'A
ê
@
I TH E U NI
N
TED STA TES DI
STRI T C O UR T
C
FO R TH E W ESTERN DI
STRI T O F V I G I I
C
R N A
R O AN O K E D I SI N
VI O
LESTER C.W ELL S,
FE 1 12 1
B
24
J A C.
ULt
BK
DEP
'Y. ERK
- CL
CLERK
C A SE N O .7: 4C V 0004
1
8
Pl ntf ,
ai i f
V.
M E M O R AN D U M O PI I N
N O
JUSTI M I
N
RRETT,
By: Jam esC.Tur
k
Se or Unied St esD i t i Judge
ni
t
at
s r ct
D efendant
.
Lese C. W els a Vigi a i t pr e ng pr K , fl t s cvi rg s a ton
tr
l,
r ni nma e oce di
o
ied hi i l i ht c i
purua t 42 U. C. j1
s nt o
S.
983. W el s s J tn M irt,algi t t whie W els was
ls ue usi re' le ng ha
t
l
l
ic r eae a t eDa v leCi J i i Ap i o 2 3 s me n kc e a b o ePlitf sjw
n ac rtd t h n il t al n rl f 01 , o o e ik d nd r k an if a
y
i t pl e . Upon rviw of t r or t c tfnds t he j1 a ton mus be
n wo ac s
e e
he ec d, he our i hatt
983 ci
t
sl rl d s s e wi o t rj d c .
tmmai imis d t u p eu ie
y
h
The c t i r r t di m i s a ac i n or c a m tl d by a pr s r a i t a
our s equied o s s ny t o
l i ie
i one ga ns
gove n e ale iy orofk e i t cour dee mi t a ton o cli i fi ous m ai i ,
r m nt ntt
t r f he
t tr nes he c i r am s rvol , lcous
o fist saeacam o wh c rle ma beg a td 2 U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) I o d rt
r al o tt li n ih eif y rn e . 8 S.
91 A( )1 . n r e o
sae acam i a y f d r lcv la to ,tep an ifsçta t a alg to mus bee o g t
tt li n n e ea ii ci n h litf ç l cu l le ains t n u h o
g
r s a rghtt r lefa ve t s c ai l ve ,'t one t ti û a i e on is f ce' r t r
aie i o ei bo he pe ul tve e l' o
ha s t usbl
pl
t a ,' a he
t meel tc eva e.'BelAt.Co . Twombl 55 U. 5 570( )
han r y sonc i bl ' l l p v.
y, 0 S. 44, 2007 .
To sae a ca e of a ton unde j1 a pli if mus esa ih t t he ha be n
tt
us
ci
r 983, antf
t tbls ha
s e
d p i e ofrg t g rn e d b te Co si to o lws o t Untd Sae a t a ti
e rv d ih s uaa te y h n tt in r a f he ie tts nd h t i s
u
de i ton r s t d f om cond tc m it d by a pe s ac i unde col of s a e l w . W e t
pr va i e ule r
uc om te
r on tng
r or t t a
s
v.At ns 48 U. 42 ( 988) The pli ifmus de
ki , 7 S.
1 .
antf
t monsrt t tt c
tae ha he onduc ca i t
t usng he
a l ged cons iutonal vi a i n i tf ry a ti a e t t St t ,'s as t qualf a l c i
le
tt i
ol to s tail trbut bl o he a e ' o
o
iy s ç tng
a
t rcol ofsaelw'(lokno a çsat a to ). Luz rv.Edmons Oi Co.457U.
mde or tt a ' as wn s çt e cin'
a
on 1 ,
S.
9 2,9 7 ( 98 ) P an ifmus sae fcss o n t a hi alg d ij r wa c usd t y a
2 3 1 2 . litf
t tt a t h wig h t s l e nu y s a e i
e
b
per o f who t St t i r ponsbl 's one '
s n or m he a e s es i e,' ome
i may f il bes i t be asa ea t '
who
ary
ad o
t t c or'
-
a sa e e oye ors one who t sace t t rwih o ha obt i sgniia ad fom
t t mpl e
ome
s
ha td ogehe t r s aned i fc nt i r
sae ofki l,' s
t t f a s'or omeonewhos C nduc i ot r s c r ea et t St t ' I
eç
co
t s he wie ha g bl o he ae. d.
'
W el fist sae fcsd mo srtn t tt e p ro wh alg dy b o e h sj w i
ls al o tt a t e n tai g ha h es n o le e l r k i a n
Ap i o 20 3 wa ç cig u d rc lro sae lw' s a t b s be tt s tt e j 1 8 .
rl f 1 s i tn n e oo f tt a ' o s o e u j c o ui md r 9 3
a
W el d e n talg t tte d fn a ti aj i e o e ,ta h o tie sg t n ad o
ls o s o le e ha h ee d n s al mply e h t e ban d ini t i r
ka
a tdj itywihsaeo tcas o ta hi c n u ti,n a ywa ,atiu a l t t esaewhe
ce on l t tt f il, r h t s o d c s i n y t b tbe o h tt
i
r
n
a u d n iidp ro b o eW el' a Be a s W el tusf ist alg f css p o t te
n nie tfe e s n r k ls jw. c u e ls h al o l e a t u p ri h
e
ng
ttt a tr'ee n o hi p r re j1 8 cam,ta cam mus be s mmaiy d s se
i ae co ' lme t f s u po td 9 3 li h t li
s
t u rl imisd
wih u p eu ie p rua tt j1 5 b ( ) a lg l fio o . An a p o rae o d rwi
t o t rj dc , u s n o 91 A( )1, s e al rv lus
y
p r p it r e l
l
i s t s da
s ue hi y.
ENTER:Ths / d yo F bray 2 4
i / a f e u r, 01 .
Sé erunie St t sDiti tJ d
hi
t d a e src
ge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?