Anderson v. Brown, et al

Filing 47

ORDER vacating March 4, 2015 Dismissal Order 37 adopting Report and Recommendations; DENYING 41 Motion for Reconsideration; OVERRULING Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety; Defendant's 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is DENIED as moot; and the matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/13/2015. (slt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II,
Plaintiff,
v.
J.L. BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
) Civil Action No. 7:14cv00184
)
)
) By: Michael F. Urbanski
)
United States District Judge
)
)
ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The court’s March 4, 2015 Dismissal Order (Dkt. # 37) adopting the report and
recommendations is VACATED;
2. Plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation (Dkt. # 38) are deemed timely
filed;
3. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 41) is DENIED as moot;
4. Plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation are OVERRULED and the
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Dkt. # 36) is ADOPTED in its entirety;
5. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 22) is GRANTED;
6. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 39) is DENIED as moot; and
7. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.
It is SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion to the pro se plaintiff and to counsel of record.

Entered: April 13, 2015

/s/ Michael F. Urbanski
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge

2