Formica v. Superintendent of the Central Virginia Regional Jail

Filing 118

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 109 ; denying 58 Motion to Stay; granting 59 Motion to Dismiss; granting 62 Motion to Dismiss; granting 91 Motion to Dismiss; denying 108 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 113 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document; denying 34 Motion to Stay;This matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/21/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION MICHAEL FORMICA, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CENTRAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:14cv00357 ) ) ) By: Michael F. Urbanski ) United States District Judge ) ) )   ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 109) is ADOPTED in its entirety; 2. Respondents’ motions to dismiss the § 2254 petition (ECF Nos. 59, 62, 91) are GRANTED; 3. Petitioner’s motions to stay and abey (ECF Nos. 34, 58) are DENIED; 4. Petitioner’s motion to amend (ECF No. 108) is DENIED; 5. Petitioner’s § 2254 petition is DISMISSED with prejudice; 6. Petitioner’s second motion for extension to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report (ECF No. 113) is DENIED as moot; and 7. This matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order and the Memorandum Opinion to the pro se petitioner and to counsel of record. Entered: September 21, 2015 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge 2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?