Formica v. Pitts

Filing 47

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss; Defendants are DIRECTED to file an answer and any addtional dispositive motion regarding plaintiff's remaining claims within 30 days from the entry of this order. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/5/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
j ' cj axs oo j t.g. sm cou. z c; J nj AT ROANOKE, VA rj ro u I THE UM TED S N TATESDI CT COURT STRI FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W R GI A CT NI R O A N O K E D I SI N W O At 25 2 1 s 05 J I UL B Y; i I uR K cE MI i FORM I CHAEL CA . b' , Pl i if antf, v . F.G.AYLOR,ET AL. , l I Dee nts. fnda t) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.7:4CV0 1 0449 ORDER By:Gln E.Conr e ad chifUnie St t sDit c Judge e td a e srit t a c r a c wi t ea c mp n igme rn u o no i i h r b n c o d n e t h c o a yn mo a d m piin,t s e e y h l AD JU D G ED A N D O RD ER ED asf l i s olow : 1 1 . 7 ' I . Dee d ns mo in t d s s ( No.25 i GRANTED I PART AND fn a t' to o imis ECF )s N DENI ED I PART: t m o i n i DENI N he to s ED as t pl ntY s ca ms t t o ai i li ha de e nt dea f nda s lyed or de le o a s ge y c r f t s rous medialne ds rid r l ur r a e or wo e i c e bas d o pl i ifs i ge e but t moton i GRANTED a t a 1 ot r e n antf ndi nc , he i s s o l he c am s li ; 2. : : De e f ndant a e DI s r RECTED t fl a a we a a a tona dipostve o ie n ns r nd ny ddii l s ii m o i r ga di pl ntY sr mailng c am swihi 30 da fom e r oftls ton e r ng ai i e zi l i t n ys r nty li or r a de ; nd 3. Thi m a tr i REFERRED t Unied St t M ag sr t J s te s o t aes ita e udge J l C.Hoppe, oe p ru n t 2 U. C.j6 ()1 ( ,frc n u to a p o it pr c e ig a d u s a t o 8 S. 36 b( )B) o o d c f p r prae o e dn s n . f t s ison ofa r por s ti f t fndi off t c l i of lw, or he ubm s i e t e tng orh i ngs ac, onc usons a a ar co me d diposto nd e m nde s ii n. XNTER:Thi S N d yo Au s, 2015. s a f gut Cli fUnied St t D i ti tJ le t a es sr c udge ' 1 r i ! l l I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?