Formica v. Pitts
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss; Defendants are DIRECTED to file an answer and any addtional dispositive motion regarding plaintiff's remaining claims within 30 days from the entry of this order. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/5/2015. (tvt)
j
'
cj axs oo j t.g. sm cou.
z
c; J nj
AT ROANOKE,
VA
rj ro
u
I THE UM TED S
N
TATESDI CT COURT
STRI
FOR THE W ESTERN DI
STRI OF W R GI A
CT
NI
R O A N O K E D I SI N
W O
At 25 2 1
s
05
J I
UL
B
Y;
i
I
uR
K
cE
MI i FORM I
CHAEL
CA
.
b'
,
Pl i if
antf,
v
.
F.G.AYLOR,ET AL.
,
l
I
Dee nts.
fnda t)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.7:4CV0
1
0449
ORDER
By:Gln E.Conr
e
ad
chifUnie St t sDit c Judge
e td a e srit
t a c r a c wi t ea c mp n igme rn u o no i i h r b
n c o d n e t h c o a yn mo a d m piin,t s e e y
h
l
AD JU D G ED A N D O RD ER ED
asf l i s
olow :
1
1
.
7
'
I
.
Dee d ns mo in t d s s ( No.25 i GRANTED I PART AND
fn a t' to o imis ECF
)s
N
DENI
ED I PART: t m o i n i DENI
N
he to s
ED as t pl ntY s ca ms t t
o ai i
li
ha
de e nt dea
f nda s lyed or de le o a s ge y c r f t s rous medialne ds
rid r l ur r a e or wo e i
c
e
bas d o pl i ifs i ge e but t moton i GRANTED a t a 1 ot r
e n antf ndi nc ,
he
i s
s o l he
c am s
li ;
2.
:
:
De e
f ndant a e DI
s r
RECTED t fl a a we a a a tona dipostve
o ie n ns r nd ny ddii l s ii
m o i r ga di pl ntY sr mailng c am swihi 30 da fom e r oftls
ton e r ng ai i
e zi l i
t n
ys r
nty
li
or r a
de ; nd
3.
Thi m a tr i REFERRED t Unied St t M ag sr t J
s te s
o
t
aes
ita e udge J l C.Hoppe,
oe
p ru n t 2 U. C.j6 ()1 ( ,frc n u to a p o it pr c e ig a d
u s a t o 8 S. 36 b( )B) o o d c f p r prae o e dn s n
.
f t s ison ofa r por s ti f t fndi off t c l i of lw,
or he ubm s i
e t e tng orh i ngs ac, onc usons a
a ar co me d diposto
nd e m nde s ii n.
XNTER:Thi S N d yo Au s, 2015.
s
a f gut
Cli fUnied St t D i ti tJ
le
t
a es sr c udge
'
1
r
i
!
l
l
I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?