Smith v. Hardy et al

Filing 50

ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 47 ; granting in part 36 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Tiffin L. Smith has thirty (3 0) days to file one amended complaint clarifying his factual allegations against Officer Richard Caligiuri and setting forth the factual basis for his failure-to-protect claim against Officer J. Lotts, Sergeant C. J. Mundy, and Corporal C. Woods. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/21/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION TIFFIN L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF CHIP HARDY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:14cv00477 ) ) ) By: Michael F. Urbanski ) United States District Judge ) ) ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this day, the court ADOPTS in part and DENIES in part the report and recommendation (ECF No. 47), OVERRULES Officer Caligiuri’s objections (ECF No. 48), DENIES Officer Caligiuri’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30), GRANTS Sherriff Harding and ACRJ’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23), and GRANTS in part Tiffin L. Smith’s motion to amend (ECF No. 36). Smith has thirty (30) days to file one (1) amended complaint clarifying his factual allegations against Officer Richard Caligiuri and setting forth the factual basis for his failure-to-protect claim against Officer J. Lotts, Sergeant C. J. Mundy, and Corporal C. Woods. Entered: September 21, 2015 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?