Muhammad v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al

Filing 217

ORDER granting 175 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 207 Report and Recommendations; adopting 208 Report and Recommendations; denying 210 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 213 Motion for Reconsideration; the clerk sha ll SCHEDULE this matter for a trial before a seven-member advisory jury as to Claim 5 and the defendants are PROHIBITED from putting on specific evidence as directed within this order. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 1/27/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
cl RKS OF I E U.. S COUc ' P ' F C S DIX AT ROANOKE, VA F? LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I T C O U RT C FOR TH E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F W R G I A C NI RO AN O K E DI SI N W O A BDU L. A M ZA W A LI M UH AM M A D , H J 2? 2 1 A. 27 J AC 0 ULI SY: C CA SE N O .7: 4CV 00529 1 Pl ntf ai if, O RD ER V. RANDALL CI ARLES M ATH ENA, I By: G l n E.C onr e ad C hi fU nied St e Di t i Judge e t at s s r ct W K , D efendant s. I ac or nc wih t ac ompa ng m e a um opi on,i i he e n c da e t he c nyi mor nd ni t s r by AD TUD G ED A N D O R DER ED asf l s olow : Afe t co ts√©tnovor viw oft petne po tonsoft rpor a t r or t tr he ur' ee he ri nt ri he e t nd he ec d,he p an ifso j ci n t t erp r a r c mme d to o s l to ( No. 0 )a d litf be to s o h e o t nd e o n ain n poi in ECF 2 7 n a t rpo t ndrc mme ain o Cli 1( No. 0 )a eOVERRULED, n boh he e r a e o nd to n am ECF 28 r ad t r por s a e A D O PTED ; e t r Thepanifsp n i gmoi n frj d me ta ama tro lw a t Cli 5 ( No. li tf e d n to o u g n s te f a s o am ECF 21 )a dhi mo in s e igt p ru aspaaes o ito cam frd ma e ( No 0 n s to e kn o u s e e rt p lain li o n g s ECF . 21 )aeDENI a wih u mei; 3 r ED s t o t rt 3. Thed fn a t's p e na moin f rsl r j d me to Cli 1( No.1 5 e e d n s u plme tl to o l mmay u g n n am ECF 7) i GR ANTED,a t c e k s lTERM I s nd he l r hal NATE t f l wi de e nt aspa te t he olo ng f nda s ris o t s l w s t M a he Da a K e e hi a ui: t na, y, nd gl y; 4. Th cek s alS e lr h l CHEDULE ti ma trf rtilb f r asve - mb ra v s r j r a h s te o ra eo e e nme e d io y u y t t c ts e ri s c he our' a le t onve e , a t Cl i 5, alegi t t on J nua y 5, 201 nince s o am l ng ha a r 3, def nda s Co e and Bihop f l t i e ve t pr e t t pl ntf fom a he e nt yl s aied o ntr ne o ot c he ai if r not r i a e' physc la s uls a nm t s i a s a t ; nd 5. Bas on √Ľndi a co l i t tpr s of i l ne i nty a l e s i t o of ed ngs nd nc us ons ha i on /c a s glge l low d pola i n ce ti vi o f t r e nt t pli ifs Cl i 5,t de e nt t t tc am a e ra n de oo age elva o antf am he f nda s o ha l i r s be tt t f lo n sncinsa til ()t e d fnd n sa ePROHI TED fo u j c o he o lwig a to t ra : a h ee a t r BI rm puti on e de e r ga di t pl ntf s di cplna y c r s o c ci n a ii tng vi nc e r ng he ai if s i i r ha ge r onvi to rsng fom t J r r 5,201 i ient(o t e e s h e de e wo d ot r s be r he ama y 3, ncd t he xtnt uc vi nc ul he wie a misbl) ort t a t lcontnt oft vi f a is l,i udi t m itn d si e, o he cua e s he deo ootge tef ncl ng he te d cso rj ci t p an ifsd si ln r a p a;a d ( t c u tS e iin ee t he litf icpi ay p e l n b) he o r HALL isnzt ng nt c t ej r t t r c r i o t eJ n r 5atrain wa ma e t panifrq e tdt a h u y ha a e o dng f h a uay lec to s d ,he litf e u se h t ' i be pr e v but i was s e ue l l tt oug no ful of t pli if a t t es r ed, t ubs q nty os hr h a t he antf, nd he jlo ss o l n ta s met ttelc o c ro o aigo j ciee d n eu d r n st e t r h ud o su ha h a k f o r b rtn b e tv vie c n emie h r pl i ifsver i ofe nt s r antf son ve s uroundi t fgh . ng he i t The Cl r i diece t s nd c e oft s or r a t ac e k s r t d o e opi s hi de nd he compa ng m e a l nyi mor ndtm opi on t J ni o udgeHoppe, o M uhn a a t couns lofr or f rde e nt. t mm d, nd o e ec d o f nda s ENTER:Ths $1 d yo Jn ay 2 7. i a f a u r, 01 ChifUnie St t sDititJ e d a e src udge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?