Smith v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations in its entirety as the memorandum opinion of the court and GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 3/4/2016. Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (slt)

Download PDF
rL ERKSOFFI U,s.Dl GOURCE sT. I ATROANOKE,VA FI LED I TI E UNI N I TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI T O F W R G I I C N A R O AN O K E D W I ON SI LARRY W AYNE SM I , TH MA2 'i 2 1 26 Jull BK -A . Ut , ER K / n CASE NO.7: 4CV00686 1 Pe ii r ttone , FI NAL O RDER V. m u c' R , RG I A DEPARTM ENT ro VI NI o F co n u Ec Tl x s, o By: G l n E.C o e nrad C hi fU nie St t sD i t c Judge e t d a e s ri t R e ponde . s nt I a co da ewih t a co pa ng memor ndum o ni i i he eb n c r nc t he c m nyi a pi on, t s r y A DA Y G ED A N D O R DER ED a f l v: s olos s 1 . Afe t c ts X novo r viw oft pe tne poqi oft r c d,peiine' tr he our' ee he ri nt ons he e or tto rs o j cinst t ema itaej d e srpo t ndr c mme ain a eOVERRULED, nd be to o h g srt u g ' e r a e o nd to r a t e r p r a d r c mme d to ( No 2 ) i ADOPTED i is e trt a t e h e o t n e o n ain ECF . 5 s n t n iey s h m e o a l opi on oft co t m r ndlm ni he ur; 2. Re po e tsmoi nt d s s ( No. )i GRANTED, n t ep tto f ram i o s nd n ' to o imis ECF 8 s a d h eiin o tf h b a c r u t e 2 U. C.j2 5 i DI M I ED wihprj iea src e 9o a e s o p s md r 8 S. 2 4 s S SS t eudc nd tik n m t aci doc toft c u and he tve ke he ott 3. Fi i t t pe ii ne has f ie t m a a s t nta s nd ng ha tto r a ld o ke ubsa i l howi of t de a of a ng he ni l c nsi to a rg ta r q ie b 2 U. C.j2 5 ()1,ac riiaeo a pe lb l yi o tt in l ih s e urd y 8 S. 2 3 c () e t c t f p aa ii s u f t D EN I . ED Exl w s+ xR: d yo Mac , 01 . a f rh 2 6 Chi fUnie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udge .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?