Hamilton v. Antony et al

Filing 34

ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay filing fee or respond to this order within ten (10) days of this Order's entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 9/22/2015. (slt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION RICKY LYNN HAMILTON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:15-cv-00022 v. ORDER DR. JOSEPH ANTONY, et al, Defendant(s). By: Hon. Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff instituted this civil action and was granted the opportunity to proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that plaintiff could pay the $350.00 filing fee via installments from an inmate trust account, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). It has come to the attention of the court that plaintiff has been released from incarceration. Inasmuch as plaintiff is no longer an inmate, plaintiff is no longer subject to the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which allowed plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee via installments. Finding good cause, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff is assessed the $350.00 filing fee and the applicable $50.00 administrative fee and is directed to pay this $400.00 total in full or otherwise respond to this Order within ten (10) days of this Order’s entry, and plaintiff shall maintain an address of record where plaintiff will receive the court’s orders. Failure to pay the fee in full or otherwise respond to this Order within the time allowed and to maintain an address of record shall result in the immediate dismissal of this action without prejudice. All pleadings should be mailed to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, 210 Franklin Road, S.W., Suite 540, Roanoke, VA 24011-2208. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all parties. Enter: September 22, 2015 /s/ Robert S. Ballou Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?