Blyden v. Clarke et al
Filing
45
ORDER granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 43 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims under state law are DISMISSED without prejudice; the clerk SHALL strike the case from the active docket of the court and provide the parties with a true copy of the summary judgment opinion entered this day in the related case of Peters vs. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-598. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 8/26/2015. (tvt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
DARYL BLYDEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, ET AL.,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 7:15CV00042
FINAL ORDER
By: Norman K. Moon
United States District Judge
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ADJUDGED AND ORDERED
as follows:
1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docket nos. 24 and 36) are GRANTED as
to plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and all such claims are DISMISSED with
prejudice, except his law library claims, which are DISMISSED without prejudice;
2. Plaintiff’s claims under state law are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1367(c);
3. Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the reassignment of this case (docket no. 43) is
DENIED; and
4. The clerk SHALL strike the case from the active docket of the court and provide the
parties with a true copy of the summary judgment opinion entered this day in the related
case of Peters v. Clarke, No. 7:14CV00598.
ENTER: This 26th day of August, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?