Blyden v. Clarke et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 43 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims under state law are DISMISSED without prejudice; the clerk SHALL strike the case from the active docket of the court and provide the parties with a true copy of the summary judgment opinion entered this day in the related case of Peters vs. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-598. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 8/26/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DARYL BLYDEN, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, ET AL., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 7:15CV00042 FINAL ORDER By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docket nos. 24 and 36) are GRANTED as to plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and all such claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, except his law library claims, which are DISMISSED without prejudice; 2. Plaintiff’s claims under state law are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); 3. Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the reassignment of this case (docket no. 43) is DENIED; and 4. The clerk SHALL strike the case from the active docket of the court and provide the parties with a true copy of the summary judgment opinion entered this day in the related case of Peters v. Clarke, No. 7:14CV00598. ENTER: This 26th day of August, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?