Vigil v. Walrach et al
Filing
45
ORDER denying 44 Motion for Reconsideration re 43 Order on Motion for Sanctions, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Frank Vigil, Jr.. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 1/4/2016. (slt)
i.
'w.
*
CLERK' OFFI t B. ST.
S
CE p. DI COURT
AT ROANOKJ,
VA
FI
LED
1 2i 2 1
AN
26
I TH E U N I
N
TED STATE S D I
STRI T C O UR T
C
FO R TH E W E STER N D I
STR I O F V I G I I
CT
R N A
J
U
BY:
.
D
,
L
ERK
ROANOKE DI SI
W OX
FM N K VIG IL,JR .
,
Pl ntf
ai if,
Ci lA c i N o.7: 5- vvi ton
1 c 0006
3
V.
JO H N W ALR ACH ,etaI,
.
De e
f ndant .
s
By:
H on.M i
chaelF.U rbanski
Unied St e Di t c Judge
t
at s s ri t
Pr s nty be o e t co ti pr K pli ifFr nk Vi l J .sm oton f rr c i r to
e e l f r he ur s o
antf a
gi, r'
i o e onsde ai n
o t c u tsDe e e 1 , 01 , d rg a tn d fnd ns moi nfrs mmayj g n .A
f he o r' c mb r 0 2 5 Or e rn ig ee a t' to o u r ud me t
pat ma ma eamoint atro a n aj d me t ru n t Fe e a Ru eo Cii
ry y k
to o l r me d u g n pu s a t o d r l l f vl
e
Pr edur 59()underveylmie cr tnce :t a ommodat a i eve ng c ngei
oc e e
r i td icumsa s o cc
e n ntr ni ha n
co r lng lw , o a co f ne e de enota ia ea ti l t c r c a ce re oroflw,
ntoli a t c unt or w vi nc
va lbl t ra , o ore t la n'
a
o t prv n ma ietij sie P c I . v. Na' Fr I s Co, 48F.d3 6 4 3(t
r o e e t nf s n u tc . a .ns Co. Am. tl ie n . .1 3 9 , 0 4h
Ci.1 9 )se e:, vev CODESCO, 6 F.d8 7 8 9(t Ci. 9 )
r 9 8; e . ..bo .
5 9 2 0 , 0 4h r 1 78.
Aferr viwi pli ifsa gumen s t c t us de pl ntf sm o i n bec us i
t e e ng antf' r
t , he our m t ny ai if
to
a et
doesnota e sac ngei co r lng 1w orne e de ea f l t esa ih acla e or
ddr s ha
n ntoli a
w vi nc nd ais o t bls
e r n'
o lw o ma fs ij sie M oin t atro n n j d me tt yn tb u e , o v r t
f a r nie tn u tc . to s o le r me d u g n รป o e s d h we e ,o
ma
r iea g me t whc c udh v be nr ie p irt t is a c o t j d me t n rma
as r u n s ih o l a e e as d ro o he su n e f he u g n , o y
t y beus d t a gue ac eunde anove lgal he y t tt pa t hadt a lt t a es i
he
e o r
as
r
l e t or ha he ry
he biiy o ddr s n
t fr ti t nce' Pa I . ,s a Pli ifsm oto f r onsde a i whih li no hi
he is nsa .' c. ns Co. upr . antf'
i n or ec i r ton, c is t ng
mor t n ar ue tt tt dititc utc ngeism i 'doe note il hi t r le Se
e ha eq s ha he src ot' ha
t nd,' s
ntte m o e if es
di y, a ntf
ec.UniedStt v. ila ,674F. 31 31 ( h Ci.1 .A ccor ngl pl i ifs
. , t aes W lims
2d 0, 3 4t r 982)
m oton f rr c i r t o i D ENI .
i o e ons de a i n s
ED
P
<
%
The Cl r s l s nd a c oft sO r rt t pa te .
e k ha l e
opy hi de o he r i s
I i s ORDERED.
ts o
vxmu :
ENTER: Thi
s
da of
y
9.
o lG .
mber 2? =
, d+5
/ f- 4 J f W & G
+
A
Unied Stt Diti J e
t
aes srct ud
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?