Toghill v. Clarke

Filing 33

ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. A Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED as to whether the Supreme Court of Virginia's adjudication of claim one is contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558(2003),under the analysis required by 28 U.S.C. §2254, Williams v.Taylor, 529 U.S. 362(2000), and its progeny, but is DENIED as to any other claim. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 2/22/2016. (slt)

CL S O/FI U. . ST,
ERK'
CE S DI COURi
AT RoM oc ,
VA

FIEP
L

I TVE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FOR THE W ESTERN DI
STRI OF VI NI
CT
RGI A
R O AN O K E D I SI N
W O
A D AM DA R R I K T O G H I
C
LL,
Pet toner,
ii
V.

HAROLD W .CLARKE,
R e ponde .
s
nt

FEB 23 2 1
25
'

JUL - .
K DUD ,
j
BY:
. D
î
.

C i lA c i n N o. : 5- vvi t o
7
' 1 c 00119

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

FI
NAL ORUER
By:

Hon.M i hae F.Urbans
c l
ki
Unie St esDit c Judge
t d at
s rit

I a co da e wih t a co nyi M e o a um Opi on en e ed t sda i l
n c t nc t he c mpa ng m r nd
ni
t r hi y, t s
A D JUD G ED and O RD ERED

t tRe po ntsmoton t dim isi GRANTED;t pe ii n f rawrtofha a c pus
ha s nde '
i o s s s
he tto o
i
be s or

Pu s a tt 28U. . j2 5 i DI S
ru n o
SC. 2 4 s SMI SED; c ri aeo a p aa l yi GRANMED a t
a et t f p e lbit s
sc
i
so
wh t e t Su e Cozt fVigna sa j dc to o cam o ei c nr 'o o a
eh r he prme t'o r ii' du iain f li n s o tryt , r n
t
u r a t b ea p iaino , wr n ev. x s 5 9U. 55 ( 0 3 ,md rt ea ay i
n e sma l p lc to f La e c Te a , 3 S. 8 2 0 ) t e h n l ss
rq ie b 2 U. C. 2 4, i imsv Ta l r 5 9U. 3 2( 0 0 , n isp o e y bu i
e ur d y 8 S. â 25 W l a . yo , 2 S. 6 2 0 ) a d t r g n , t s
l
DENI a t a ot rc am ;a t a ton i STRI EN f o t a tvedoc toft
ED s o ny he l i nd he c i s
CK
r m he c i
ke i he
court
.

The Clr s l s nd aco o t sOr ra t a c
e k ha l e
py f hi de nd he c ompa ng M e o a
nyi
m r ndum Opi o
ni n
t t pa tes
o he r i .

ExTsR: Thi
s

y--a aorbur 2016.
7pldy feray
,

f f* Y g J /.W V-VV
w
A
'
:

U nie St t s Di t i tJ
t d a e sr c udge

K