Ratliff v. Clarke et al

Filing 5

FINAL ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and this action shall be stricken from the active docket. Certificate of appealability is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/1/2015. (slt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION RANDALL ELMER RATLIFF, Petitioner, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143 FINAL ORDER By: Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Ratliff’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DISMISSED without prejudice and this action shall be STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Further, finding that Ratliff has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to the petitioner. Entered: April 1, 2015 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?