Ratliff v. Clarke et al
Filing
5
FINAL ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and this action shall be stricken from the active docket. Certificate of appealability is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/1/2015. (slt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
RANDALL ELMER RATLIFF,
Petitioner,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143
FINAL ORDER
By: Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED
and ADJUDGED that Ratliff’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DISMISSED without prejudice
and this action shall be STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.
Further, finding that Ratliff has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and accompanying
Memorandum Opinion to the petitioner.
Entered: April 1, 2015
/s/ Michael F. Urbanski
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?