Anderson v. Witherspoon et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting that Plaintiffs motion to amend 28 is GRANTED in part as to allegations against defendant Dr. Witherspoon and is DENIED in part as to proposed defendants "Dental Department'', the Virginia Department of Corrections, an d T.Coyner; the motion to amend SHALL be captioned as "Amended Complaint". Dr. Witherspoon's motion for summary judgment 20 is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time is DENIED as moot; Dr. Wi therspoon shall FILE an updated motion for summary judgment supported by affidavit(s) that includes the one-page document Plaintiff requested via a motionfor discovery 26 , unless averred not to be within Dr. Witherspoon's possession, custody, or control, and addresses the amended complaint 28 within thirty days, pursuant to Standing Order 2013-6; and Plaintiff's motion or discovery 26 isDENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/30/2015. (slt)

Download PDF
'L : OFFI U'. ST,COURT C ERK' CE s DI AT ROANOKE,V A R LED d2k 3 2 2 5 2 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I CO U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI W I A M LEE A N DER SO N ,l , LLI l Pl ntf , ai if V. PHI P H kW I ERSPO ON,e al, LI TH t . D ef endant s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) J A C. ULI BY: D' 1W , . C . Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00236 vi t on 15- v- By: H on. i M chaelF.Ur bansd l U nie St e D it i tJudge t d at s s r c l ac or nc wih t wrte M e a n c da e t he itn mor ndum Opi on e e e t sda i i he e ni nt r d hi y, t s r by O R DER ED t Pli ifsmotont a nd ( No.28)i GRANTED i pa ta t algai a i t hat antf i o me ECF s n r s o le tons gans de enda Dr W ihe s f nt . t r poon a i DENI i pa ta t pr e de e nd s ED n r s o opos d f ndan sç e a t r nt l De rm e 't Vigi aDe rm e ofCore tons a T.Coyne ;t moton t n e pa t nt' he r ni pa t nt t c i , nd r he i o m nd SHALL beca i ne a ç pto d s s nded Co pli f' Dr W ihe s Ame m a n ; . t r poon' moton f sl ma y s i or lm r j g n i DI I ED wih u p eu iea mo t Plitf smoinf ra e tnso o tme ud me t s SM SS t o t rj dc s o ; an if to o n xe in f i i DENI a mo t Dr W ih rpo n s al LE a u d tdmo inf rs mmayj d me t s ED s o ; . t es o h lFI n p ae to o u r u g n s p o tdb afd vts t tncu e teo - g d c me t anifrq e tdvaamoi n u p re y fia it) ha i ld s h nepa e o u n Plitf e u se i to f dicovey( No.26) t e sa re nott bewihi Dr W ihes n' pos e so or s r ECF ,mls verd o t n . t rpoo s s sin, c so y o c nr l a da de s stea n e c mp an ( No 2 )wih ntit da s u t d , r o to , n d r se h me d d o lit ECF . 8 ti hry y , purua t Stndi Or r201 6;a Pli ifsmoi f dic r ( No. i s nt o a ng de 3- nd antf' ton or s ovey ECF 26) s DENI wi u p eudc . ED t t rj ie ho The Cl k s l s nd co esoft s Or ra t a om pa ng M em or nd Opi on er ha l e pi hi de nd he cc nyi a um ni t t pari o he tes. ENTER :Thi s %: - dyoxoe e,0 5 a f vmbr2 . U nie St t D i t i tJ t a es sr c udge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?