Farley v. Clarke et al

Filing 57

ORDER denying 33 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 46 Motion to Substitute Party ; denying 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting 52 Report and Recommendations; denying 53 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; and the case is STRICKEN from the active docket. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/17/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ' OFF, u.s. sm cour EM . GE Dl AT DANVI E,VA FI LL L . ED MA2 1?:07 21 I TH E U N I D STA TES D I N TE STR I CO UR T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI D AR R ELL E.FA R I EY , , Pl ntff ai i , H AROLD CLARKE,e al, t . D ef nda s e nt . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 C, R CL RK QL DUDL B ' $4 Y . c EP C i lA c i N o.7: 5- vvi t on 1 : 00352 FI A L O R D ER N By: H on.Jac on L .K i e u sr Se or U nie St e D it i tJudge ni t d at s s r c I a c r a c wiht wrte M e rn u Op no e trdt i d y,ti h rby n c o d n e t he i n mo a d m i in n ee hs a i s e e t A DJUD G ED and O R DE RED t tDe e nt 'm oto t s tt t pa te i GR ANTED;M a i Var t VDOC ha f nda s i n o ubsiu e ris s re go, he Co r c i Oper tonsAdm i sr t ,i JOI r e tons ai nita or s NED asadef nda ;Pl ntf ' m o i n t n e i e nt ai ifs to o m nd s DENI Plitf o j ci n t teRe o t n Re o n ainaeOVERRULED;he ED; an ifs be to s o h p r a d c mme d to r t Re o t n Re o nd to i ADOPTED; litf' moin frsl r u g n a d p r a d c mme ai n s P an ifs to o l mmayj d me t n mo inf rap ei n r ij n to a eDENI Dee d n s moinf rs mmayj d me ti to o rlmi ay nu cin r ED; fn a t' to o u r u g n s GRANTED;a t c s i STRI nd he a e s CKEN fom t a tvedoc t r he c i ke . The Clr s l s nd c e oft sOr ra t a ompa ng M e o a e k ha l e opi s hi de nd he cc nyi m r ndum Opi on ni t t pa te o he ris. ENTER:T i l hs N+u dyo Mac, 2017. a f rh > . t Se ' rU nie St t D i ti tJ t d a es s r c udge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?