Bayadi v. Clarke et al
Filing
43
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE (Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/3/2018. (tvt)
··.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Roanoke Division
HASAN BAYADI,#J081420,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 7: 15-cv-00618
I r \" () l.f! CLARKE, et al ..
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
0.,
this day the Court considered the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.
lJ PON CONSIDERATION WHEREFORE, it appearing to this Court that this matter has
·been rcc;olved by and between the parties, by written agreement, there are no longer any issues in
th j.; :1ct ~ ,,., he tween Plaintiff and the Defendants to be determined by this Court. This Order shall
dischm·:·,· Defendants from all claims and demands related to this lawsuit and from all claims
ari•dn~
Put ofthe sanie facts: it is therefore
'l.IUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH
·'· 1
PRFI! '"''CE.
ENTERED:
Y'1 .3
12018
I her~:b) agree to the entry ofthe above Order:
Hn r1n Bayadi, #I 08 20, prose
Su·' ., ! '~t:llc Prison
244 I ·I i\ lusselwhite Drive
Waverly. Virginia 23891
Plailll i/1'
I i .. \... \,. .. "rce to the entry of the above Order:
d~;28
· !qstice & Public Safety Division.
· ,:,c Attorney General
20~ .
;, 9 1h Street
Ric'J!' :,d, Virginia 23219
Phon•:: OW4) 786-5630
Fa'·
') 786-4239
I
"lhill@oag.statc.va.us
Cr>
0:
(.
· Defendanls
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?