Bayadi v. Clarke et al

Filing 43

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE (Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 8/3/2018. (tvt)

Download PDF
··. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division HASAN BAYADI,#J081420, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 7: 15-cv-00618 I r \" () l.f! CLARKE, et al .. Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 0., this day the Court considered the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. lJ PON CONSIDERATION WHEREFORE, it appearing to this Court that this matter has ·been rcc;olved by and between the parties, by written agreement, there are no longer any issues in th j.; :1ct ~ ,,., he tween Plaintiff and the Defendants to be determined by this Court. This Order shall dischm·:·,· Defendants from all claims and demands related to this lawsuit and from all claims ari•dn~ Put ofthe sanie facts: it is therefore 'l.IUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH ·'· 1 PRFI! '"''CE. ENTERED: Y'1 .3 12018 I her~:b) agree to the entry ofthe above Order: Hn r1n Bayadi, #I 08 20, prose Su·' ., ! '~t:llc Prison 244 I ·I i\ lusselwhite Drive Waverly. Virginia 23891 Plailll i/1' I i .. \... \,. .. "rce to the entry of the above Order: d~;28 · !qstice & Public Safety Division. · ,:,c Attorney General 20~ . ;, 9 1h Street Ric'J!' :,d, Virginia 23219 Phon•:: OW4) 786-5630 Fa'· ') 786-4239 I "lhill@oag.statc.va.us Cr> 0: (. · Defendanls 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?