Marshall v. Amherst County Circuit Court

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/28/2016. (tvt)

A#xN lk,A
' kliM
FI
LE;

,

I THE INI D s wrlsDlrm c'cot r
N
J TE l r
sr r m'
Fo R TH E w E sTEl x m sTm c' oF VI G I A
t
r
R NI
R O A N O K E DI I O N
V SI

MA 23 11
2
CC
JL
w
B .

,

n

p

EDW A R D LER O Y M V SH AI, JR .
L, ,
Pl ntf ,
ai i f

cu

.

.

L

Ci lA ct on N o.7: cvvi
i
16- 00057

M EM O M ND U M O PI O N
M
A M H ER ST C O UN TY CI CU I
R
T
C O U RT ,
Dee
f ndant
.

By:

H o Jac t on L . i e
n. ls
K sr
Se or U nied St e D i t i tJudge
ni
t
at s s r c

Ed r Le oy M a s l,J . aVigi apr ti lde ane pr e ngpr K , ie a
wa d r
r ha l r, r ni era t i e oce di
o fld

c an purua t 42U. C.j198 na ngt Amhes Count Cic tCo tast s e
omplit s nt o
S.
3 mi he
rt
y rui ur he ol
de e nt Pl i i fnot t the i a de e nti o g ng c i lpr e di i t ts a e
f nda . a ntf es ha
s
f nda n n- oi dm na oc e ngs n ha t t
co t a he a ksm e t or rt sa e c ur t c nge ve ,a nt: ne and e f c i '
ur , nd
s
o de he t t o t o ha
nue ppoi t w
a
f e tve '

c t e, t sa aCul i tg ae 'jzy.
oms lal e t t l ne r td'l
d
f yr
Fe r lc ursmus no i e f r wih pe ng sa ec i i lpr ee ngsa e
de a o t
t t ntr e e t ndi t t rm na oc di
bs nt
e r r na y c r lm sa es whih a enotpr s nthe e. See e. ,Younce v. ri,401U.
xtao di r icl t nc , c r
ee
r
. c.
r Ha rs
S.

3 4 ( 9 1 ; rz d rv W a ly 1 2U. 1 ,1 9 7 ( 8 8 ; yo v. itr 8 U.
7, 4 1 7 ) Hak a e . de , 7 S. 48 6 - 0 1 9 ) Ta lr Tan o , 3 S.

3 6 3 0( 8 3 .A f d rldsrc c u t h u da sanfo c n tt to a c le e t sae
6 , 7 1 7 ) e ea itit o r s o l b ti r m o siuin l halng s o tt
j dca p o e dng , e ad e so acam' meis i t fd r l li c ul b p e e tdi
u iil r c e i s r g r ls f li s rt,f he e ea cams o d e r sn e n
t eo g i saej dca p o e dn Cie Bl eo Ch rotmnc v Gic rs, 8 F.d4 ,
h n ong tt u iil r c e ig. n ma u f alte l . . lh it 8 7 2 9
5 5 (t Ci. 9 9 .Fu t r r ,heAn ilj ncinAc, 8U. C. 2 3, x r sl
2- 3 4 h r 1 8 ) rhemo e t
t-nu to t 2 S. j 28 e p e sy
p o bt af d r l o t r m e j ii t ep o e dn sfo whihPlitf s e srle.
r hiis e ea c m'fo n onng h r c e ig r m c an if e k eif
M o e ve, fdea c u ta kjlidcint ga tma n srle a an tsaeo fcaso
r o r a e rl o r lc t s ito o rn nd mu eif g is tt fiil r
r
saea nce .Glre v.Supei Cour ofM e llnbt Cnt ,411F. 586,587( hCi.
tt ge is zly
ror t
cce ux y.
2d
4t r
1 .u
969) congrs a t fde a c t havec itnl r ogni dt tfdealc t s d
e s nd he e r l ours
onsse ty ec ze ha e r ours houl

p r t tt c u t t tysaec s s a dt a, r c n tt to a is e aie saec u'j d e
e misae o rs o r tt ae , n h t whee o siui n l su s rs , tt o l u g s
t

aef lyc mpee tt h n l t e s b e t o S prmeCo r r v e ' Bo n rv. rui Co r
r ul o tn o a de h m u j c t u e
u t e iw. n e Cic t u t
'

o S . u s 5 6F.d 1 31 1 3 ( t Ci.1 7 )(nba c .Ac o dn l 1fn i i mo e
f t Lo i, 2 2 3 , 3 6 8h r 9 5 e n ) c r igy, i d t s r
a p o raef rsaec u t t a j d c t P an ifscams a dId s s tec mp an wih u
p r p it o tt o rs o du iae litf' li , n imis h o lit t o t

p eu ie
rj d c .
EN TER : /
TI

Rda o M a c , 201
y f rh
6.
P

e
ni U nie St t sD i t i tJ
t d a e sr c udge

2