Littek v. Clarke et al

Filing 64

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 ; denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/9/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OF CEt. DlT COURT : FI JS, B . , ATDANVILE,V L A FIED L MA rC 2 1 Y 26 I TH E UN I N TED STA TE S D I STR I CO U R T CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A N O K E DI I O N V SI TH OM AS ANTH ONY LI TTEK , Pl ntf ai it V. H AR O LD C LAR K E ,e aI, t . De e f udant . s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . J AC. ML s,!wD DLEM ClqM vyEPUW CLE j& C i lA cton N o.7: 6- vvi i 1 c 00072 By: H on.Jackson L .K i ser Se or U nie St e Di t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c ThomasAnt ny Litk,aVigi a i t pr ee ngpr K ,c ho te r ni nma e oc di o omm e d a a ton nce n c i . purua t 42U. C.j 1 a ns anumbe ofc rnta f me safoft Vigi a s nt o S. 983 gai t r ure nd or r tf he r ni De rm e tofCor e tonsa Poc hont sCo r c i lCe e .Pl i ifa lgedt t pa t n r ci nd a a r e tona ntr antf le ha de e nt 'f itr st pr dehi de alte menta de t e vi a e t Ei ht f nda s a lze o ovi m nt r at nd n ur s ol t d he g h Am e ndme oft Unied St t Consiuton.Pl i ifa s fl d m o i nsf apr lm i r nt he t aes tt i antf lo ie to or ei na y ijmcin,owhihIr fre t Untd Sae M a itaeJ d ePa l M . a g n i nt to t c e erd o ie tts gsrt u g mea S r e tn a c r a c wi 28U. C. 6 6 b ( )B) c od n e t h S. j 3 ( )1( . Afe co uci a e de ir hea i J tr nd tng n vi nta y rng, udgeSa ge is d ar po ta r nt s ue e r nd r comm e to on Aprl15, e nda in i 2015, e omm e ng t t1de t m o i nsf apr lm i r rc ndi ha ny he to or ei na y ij n to .J g Sag n c n l d dt tPli tf f i dt s w t t d fnd nsd n e hm n u cin ud e r e t o cu e ha anif al o ho ha: ee a t e id i e ne s a ym e c lc r ;he i s f rng fom a s rousm e c lne d;hei lkey t s ee o ce s r di a a e s ufe i r ei di a e s i l o ucc d n l sEi hhAme me tcam; n h i lk l t s fe irp r beij r wih u ap ei nay z gt i nd n li a d e s iey o g fr re a a l nu y to t rlmi r ij n to . n u cin Plitf ha fldo j cinst t erp r a drc mme ai n Plitf ag e t t anif s i b e to o h e o t n e o nd to . an if r u s ha e J d eSa g n mia pl dt elg l tn adsf rap ei n r ijmcins tf rhi W itrv. u g r e t sp i h e a sa d r o r l ay nt to e o t n n e e mi NAtrlReour sDee eCot lI ,555U. 7,20( tza s ce fns mci.nc. S. 2008) a hec z cei st , nd ha a trze he tsi ne fo d fn a t' t e s sa mila ig.Afe rviwi Plitf o j cins te e tmo is r m e e d n s win s e s se dn tr e e ng an ifs be to ,h rpo ta r omme ton, ndpetne tpori oft rcor éqnovo,IagrewihJ e r nd ec ndai a ri n tons he e d e t udge S r e tsr c mme d to Ac o dn l , litf o j cin aeOVERRULED,h rp r ag n ' e o n ain. c r ig y P an ips b e to s r te e o t a rc nd e omm e to i ADOPTED i ise ie y,a Pli i smotonsf apr i i r nda i n s n t ntr t nd antc i or elm na y ij n to a eDENI nu cin r ED. TheCl r s l s nd c e oftlsOr t t pa te . e k hal e opi s li der o he ri s I i s O R DER ED . ts o ENTER :Thi s % da ofM a 201 y y, 6. h . P S i rU nie St t D it i tJ o t d a es s r c udge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?