Snodgrass v. Gilbert et al
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/17/2018. (slt)
CLERK' OFFI U.S. ST COURS
CE
DI .
I
AT ROANOKE,
VA
FIED
L
I THE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FO R TH E W ESTERN D I
STR I O F VI G I A
CT
R NI
R O A N O K E DI I O N
V SI
DEC 1? 2 1
23
J A e.
ULI DUD
B: X
Y
,
UTY
zw .
EK
.
R
R
.
K EVI SN O D GR ASS, .
N
JR ,
CA SE N O .7: 6C V 00091
1
Pl i i f
a nt f ,
V.
M EM O R AN D UM O PI I
N ON
CHRI
STOPHER GI
LBERT, & ,
c
By: Gl n E.Conr
e
ad
Se orUnied St e Dit itJudge
ni
t
at s s rc
De e
f ndant .
s
The pli if Ke n Snodgr s J . a Vigi a i t pr ee ng pr K ,fld tls c vi
antf, vi
as , r,
r ni nma e oc di
o
ie li i l
rg t' cin pls a tt 4 U. C.j1 8 ,riig mutpe cams Th c u th s ar a y
ih s a to t u n o 2 S.
r
9 3 asn
lil li . e o r a le d
a j d c tdma yo hi camsrg r i gp io c ndto .Afe r ve o t rc r ,h c u t
du iae n f s li e ad n rs n o i ns tr e iw.f he e o d t e o r
i
c n ld s t t t tr e d fnd ns rmanng b fr te c u t a e e tte t j d me t
o cu e ha he h e ee a t e ii e o e h o r r n ild o u g n .
S o g a sh sas tldamo inf ritro u oy ij n t er le ta tec u t s ds s.
n d rs a lo ie
to o ne lc t l n u ci eif h t h o r mu t imis
v
The c t ss ma iedt pr e alhit r oft sc s i proro ni ,ECF Nos
our ha um rz he oc dur so y hi a e n i pi ons
.
3 a d 8 . Fo r a o sae i t o e o no s t e c u tg a td sl r j d me to a1
3 q 6 r e s ns ttd n h s piin , h o r rn e l
mmay u g n n 1
camse e talg tr tl to f rt panifsl iain ef rs a d a o tdt eRe o ta
li xc p l eI eai in o he litf i g to fo t, n d' e h p r nd
e
a
t
'
p
Re o n ain o tema itaej d er g r igt er s lso ab nc tils eha c nd t d
c mme d to f h g srt u g e adn h e ut f e h ra h d o uce
on t tcai o Aug t23 a 24, 7. I lghtoft i e ve ng c ur ofa al decson i
hé l m n
us
nd 201 n i
he ntr ni o t ppe s ii n
Bo k rv S. De to Co'. 5 F.d 5 3 (t Ci.2 7 ,h we e ,t e c u tv c td t e
o e . C. p' f 1 ,8 5 3 3 4 h r 01 ) o v r h o r a ae h
r
po t n o t e o d r g a tn s mmay j g n f r d fn a t a t S o g a s camst a
ri f h r e r ni g u r ud me t o e e d n s s o n d r s ' li h t
o
de e nt Ga lha ,Gibe t a Stwa tha delye li pr r s t ough t s gr ga i se
f nda s li r l r, nd e r d a d ls og e s hr
he e e ton t p-
down pr r t r t lae a i thi f hi i onna c
og nm o e ai t gans m or s nf
l ompli sa g i va s 4 e r s of
ant nd re nce , n xe cie
hi c tt i na rg t peii Specsc ly,t co tf
s qnsim o l i ht o tton.
i a l he ur ound m ae ildiput off c a t
t ra s es a t s o
whe he t s tlee de e nt ha t e t ned t hol Snodgr s l ng i s r t d
t r he e lr
f nda s d hr a e
o
d
as o er n eg ega e
c
onfne nti he co i
me f
ntnued t fl i o m a c pli t a g i va s a a t whe he i
o ie nf r l om a n s nd re nce , nd s o
t rn
'
.
.
r t la i f hi flng s h gre nc f ms t y m a r comme to o de ii t hi r
e a iton or s i uc iva e or , he
de e
ndai ns r csons o nde
S o g a s p o rs i tese - o p o rm.Th c u t e e s mmayj d me ta t t e e
n d rs ' r g e s n h tp d wn r g a
e o r d nid u r u g n s o h s
cli s a r f red t m a tr t M a sr t J
am
nd e e r he
te o
gitae udge Pa e a M e de Sa g
m l
a
r ent f f t r
or urhe
p o e dng , u s a t o2 U. C. 6 6 b' )B)
r c e i s p ru n t 8 S. j 3 ( )1( .
(
On J y 1 201 J
ul 7, 8, udge Sa ge cond t a a tonalbe h ti o t r m ani
r nt
uced n ddii
nc ral n he e i ng
camsa d S o pus 'moin f ritro uo y ij nci r l fl Th p risa re t a t
li n n d s to o nel c tr nu t ei . e a t g e d h t he
ve e
e
j g c ud as c n i e e i e c tk n d rng t e 2 7 b n h til Th c s i prs nl
ud e o l lo o sd r v d n e a e u i h 01 e c ra. e a e s e e ty
be or . cour on J
f et
he
t
udge Sa ge ' r por a rc mme d t n Cl e rp l ,ECF No 1 0
r nts e t nd e o
n ai t e of)
o h
. 1,
'i
1
$
rc mme igj d me tf rt d fn a t, n S d r s ' be to t eeo ECFNo 1 1
e o i ndn u g n o he ee d n s a d no g a s o j cins h rt ,
. 1.
!
I'ema itaejd ema so l arc mme aint ti c ut Mah wsv. e e,
lh gsrt u g ke ny e o nd to o hs o r. te
f
W br
1
43 rr2120he (po6orhcutproposedwtmkorucomnvdtmtoaoch
2Uï i6,7-117)Tspeoricae findings.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?