Muhammad v. Smith et al
Filing
46
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss as to all claims except the retaliation contention in Claim 2 against Trent, Huff and Barksdale, and except for these defendants, the clerk will terminate all other defendants as parties to the action; granting 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; the clerk will SCHEDULE this matter for trial as to the remaining claim against Trent, Huff and Barksdale ;(Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/8/2017. (tvt)
r pn OF I us nlm ca rs FCE
s
A R A 6 ,A
T O NZ V
FI
LED
AL' 22 2 1
07
I TI E UNI
N I
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FO R TH E W ESTERN D I
STR I O F V I G I I
CT
R N A
R O AN OK E DI I O N
V SI
ABDULHAM ZA W ALIM UHAM M AD, )
)
Pl ntf,
ai if
)
v.
)
)
HAPPY EARL S I c AL.
M TH,
,
)
)
Dee
fndant .
s
)
JULA ', U L
I
BY:
CASE NO.7:
16CV00223
ORDER
By:Ho . e E. nr d
n Gln Co a
Unie Stt sDit itJudge
td a e src
I ac or ncewih t ac ompa ng m e a um opi on,i i he e
n c da
t he c
nyi
mor nd
ni t s r by
AD IUD G ED A N D O R DER ED
asf l w s'
olo .
Dr S t ' moin f rsl r j d me t( No 41 i GRANTED
. mih s to o l
mmay u g n ECF . ) s
on t gr
he ound t tM uha mad f ie t e us a i sr i r m e e
ha
m
a ld o xha t dm nitatve e di s
pr ry, a al cai s agans t s de e nt a e dim is d wih
ope l nd 1 l m
i t hi f nda r
s se
t
P eudc '
rj ie
,
Th ohe d f n a t' d s o iie mo in (
e t r e e d n s ip stv
to s ECF No 31 a d 41 ae
.
n ) r
GR ANTED ast a1 cai e e t r t lai n c e i n i Cli 2
o 1 l ms xc pt he e ai to ont nto n a m
a ns Tr nt Huf,a Ba ks l and e e f t s tze def nda s
gai t e , f nd r dae,
xc pt or he e lr e e nt ,
t ce k wilt r nae a1o he def nda sa pari t t a ton;a
he lr l e mi t 1 t r e nt s tes o he c i nd
3.
The c e k wilSCHEDULE t sm a trf ti la t t r m ani c am
lr l
hi te or ra s o he e i ng l i
a i tTr nt Huf ,a Ba ks l .
ga ns e , f nd r da e
ENTER :Tli
ls
da ofAugus,201
y
t 7.
U nie St t sD i t i tJ
t d a e s rc udge
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?