Henegar v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center Mental Health Department
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/19/2016. (tvt)
eLEnK' o'rl et.8. sm cota'
:
c J pl
Jr
AT cwàkk Ti:vl VJ
l oq
Le, .
FIED
L
I THE UNI S
N
TED TATESDI TRI COURT
S CT
FO R TH E W E STER N D I
STR I O F V I G I I
CT
R N A
ROANOKE DI I ON
V SI
CT 1! 2 1
25
.
J
.
:
, E
CL RK
.
ct RK
-
M I H A EL W .H E NEG A R ,
C
Pl ntf
ai if,
C i lA c i N o.7: 6- vvi t on
1 c 00411
M EM O R AND U M O PI O N
NI
By: G ln E.Conr
e
ad
C hi fU ni e St e D i t i tJudge
e
t d at s s r c
K EEN M O UN TA I C O R R EC TI NA L
N
O
M EN TAL H EA LTH D EPA RT M ENT ,
Dee
fndants.
t)
M i hae W .H e ga ,pr e ng pr > ,fl d aci lrgh sc
c l
ne r oc edi
o q ie
vi i t ompli ,purua t 42
ant s nt o
-
U. C.j1983.By or re ee Se e
S.
de ntrd ptmber1 201 t co tdiece plitf t s t
5, 6,he ur r td anif o ubmi
wihi 20 da fom t da eoft o de t c e t wihhol ng off f i or rt
tn
ys r he t
he r r he ons nt o t di
ees onn n de o
c eet a iai t pr e t f mapa rs Pl ntf wa a s t taf l et
omplt he pplc ton o oc ed q or
upei. ai if s dvied ha aiur o
c mpl wo dr s l i d s s a o t sa to wih u p eu ie
o y ul e ut n imis l f hi ci n t o t rj dc .
M o et 20 da ha ea ed,a pl n ifhasf l t c pl wih t des rbe
r han
ys ve lps nd aitf
aied o om y t he c i d
c n iins Ac o dn l, h c u t imisstea to wi o t rj dc a d srk stec s
o d t . c r igy t e o r ds se h cin t u p eu ie n ti e h a e
o
h
f om t a tve doc toft c t Pl ntf m a r ie t cl i s i a s pa a e adi n o e
r he c i
ke
he our . ai i f y efl he a m n e r t
o nc
pl ntf i pr pa ed t compl wih t not d c tons
ai if s e r o
y t he e ondii .
The Clr i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e or ndum Opi on a a ompa ng
ek s rce o e
opy hi m a
ni nd cc
nyi
Or t pl i if
der o a ntf .
E E :Tit Yaoocbr21.
NT R hs R y f t e,06
o
Chi Unie St t s D it i tJ
e
t d a e s r c udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?