Williams v. Trent et al

Filing 50

ORDER denying 28 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; the remaining defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit(s), within 30 days (Opinion & Order mailed to Pro Se Party)Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/19/2017. (tvt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
RASHAND WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 7:16cv00480
ORDER
By: Norman K. Moon
United States District Judge

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
1) The motion to dismiss of defendants Hairston and Bramblett-Robinson (Docket No. 28) is
DENIED.
2) The motion to dismiss of defendants Hartman, Trent, and Cox (Docket No. 32) is
GRANTED in part as to Williams’ claims against defendants Trent and Cox and DENIED
in part as to Williams’ claim against defendant Hartman.
3) Pursuant to Standing Order 2013-6, the remaining defendants shall FILE a motion for
summary judgment, supported by affidavit(s), within thirty days.
4) The Clerk shall send copies of this order and the accompanying memorandum opinion to the
parties.
19th
ENTER: This ____ day of September, 2017.