Thompson v. Clarke et al

Filing 147

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Summary Judgment ; The motion is DENIED as to Thompson's claim (2)(E) alleging that defendant Doss, in his individual capacity, failed to protect him from obtaining a razor in segregation to harm himself. The motion is GRANTED as to all other claims and defendants (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 3/31/2018. (tvt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION PAUL C. THOMPSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. H. W. CLARKE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:17cv00010 ORDER By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion (Docket No. 56) for partial summary judgment as to Count (2) of the complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to Thompson’s Claim (2)(E) alleging that defendant Doss, in his individual capacity, failed to protect him from obtaining a razor in segregation to harm himself. The motion is GRANTED as to all other claims and defendants. ENTER: This 31st day of March, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?