Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/30/2017. (slt)
ctEe s OFFI U.s, DI COURT
CE
ST.
AT RM NOKE,
VA
FI
LED
J 2 12 1
UN
27
I THE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FO R TH E W ESTER N D I
STR I O F W R G I I
CT
N A
ROANOKE DI SI
VI ON
J
BY:
DARYLL KEI SH UM AKE,
TH
Pl nt f ,
ai i f
C i lA c i N o.7: 7- v- 214
vi t on
1 c 00
V.
M EM ORANDUM OPI O N
NI
COM M ONW EALTH OF W RGI
NIA,
D e endant
f
.
By:
U LE CLERK
M
'
H o M i hae F.
n. c l Urbans
ki
U nied St esD i t i tJudge
t
at
src
Dar lKe t Shtma ,aVigi ai aepr e ng nr K ,Gld am oto f a
yl ih l ke
r ni nm t oc edi
o
e
i n or
.
p ei n r ijmcin i ti cvla to fldp ru n t 4 U.. j1 8 a an tte
r l a y nl to n h s ii cin ie u s a t o 2 SC. 9 3 g i s h
mi
Co n at o Vig na A mo n mus etbihf t ee nsb f r ap ei n r
mmo we 1 f r i i.
h
va i t sa ls ol lme t eo e rlmiay
r
ijmcinma is e 1 hei lk l t s c e do t emeis 2 hei l l t s fe irp r be
nt to y su : ) s iey o u c e n h rt; ) s i y o u fr re a a l
ke
h nni t ea s n eo p ei nayr le; )t baa c o e ute t i hi fv r a 4 a
n n h b e c f r lmi r eif 3 he ln e f q iis i n s a o ; nd ) n
ps
ij n to i i tep lci tr s.W itrv. tr l s De. t i. n .5 5U. 7 2
nu cin s n h ubi ne et n e Nau a Re . f ComclI c, 5 S. , 0
(0 8.
20)
Pli iff l t e t bls t thei lkey t s e d oït m e isofhi cli be a e
antf ais o sa ih ha
s i l o ucc e r he rt
s a ms c us
hef ist nn eapr pe de e nt Se e. ,W ilv. ihi n De to St t Po ie,491U .
al o m
o r f nda . es g. l M c aa
p' f ae lc
S.
5 , 0( 9 9 (ttn sae aeno pes n frp r os so j1 3 .Ac o dn l, anif al
8 7 1 8 ) sai g tts r t ro s o u p e f 98 ) c r igy Plitf f is
t s tsyt eee n sf rap ei n r ij n to a h smoinf rap ei nayijmcin
o aif h lme t o r l ay nu cin, nd i to o rlmi r nt to
mi
m us bede ed.
t
ni
*
E ER:hs'b dyoMa, 07
NT Ti3 a f y2 1.
#
'rz' w
' y
.
'
.
' ' .
Unie St t sDititJ
t d a e src udge
ry
ZJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?