Heard v. Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/1/2017. (slt)

Download PDF
rLERKS OFFI U. . ST. CE S DI COUR' AT ROANOKE, VA FI ED L I THE UNI N TED STATES DISTRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F W R G I I CT N A ROANOKE DI SI W ON ANTONI HEARD, O Pl ntf , ai i f Dee n t) fnda ts. B:I D D ,LR Y LA.u CE K JA U Ci lA c i n N o. 7: c 0024 vi t o 17- v- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BUR EA U O F PR I N S,e aI SO t , AL 2 12 1 C 27 EK M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: M i haelF.U r c bans ki Chi f Unied St e D it i tJudge e t at s s r c Ant o He r pr edngpr K , e a cvi rght c pli ,pur ua t Bi nsv.Si oni a d, oce i o Gld i l i s om a nt s nt o ve x . Upkno Nn e A ce t ofFe Btr a ofNa co i s 403 U. 388 ( 971 .By Or re e ed wn m d ns d. le u r tc . S. 1 4 de nt r J y 6, 7, he c ur die t dpli ift s ul 201 t o t r c e antf o ubmi wihi 20 da f o t da eo t Or rt t tn ys r m he t f he de he c e t wilhol ngoffesf m i or rt co eet a iai t pr e L fr ons nt o tl di e or n de o mplt he pplc ton o oce d q oma na rs Pl i ifwa a s d t taf lzet c upe i. antf s dvie ha ailr o ompl wo d r s ti dimi s loft sa ton y ul e ul n s s a hi c i wi o t rj d c . t u p eu ie h M o et n 20 da ha elps d,a pl ntf sf ie t c m pl wiht d c i d r ha ys ve a e nd ai ifha a ld o o y t he es rbe c n iin .Ac o dngy t c u t imis st a to wi u prj d c a dsrk stec s o dto s c r i l,he o r d s s e he cin t t eu ie n tie h a e ho fom t a tve doc toft com'.Pli ifmay r fl t cai i a s pa a ea ton onc r he c i ke he t antf e ie he l ms n e r t c i e pl ntf i pr pa edt c ai if s e r o ompl wih t no edco tons y t he t ndii . TheClr i die t d t s nd a c py oft sM e a um Opi on a a compa ng ek s rce o e o hi mor nd ni nd c nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf E TR Ti N E : hs / dyoAuut a f gs /07 , V r 21. ' y +/ r , . j y. ..y . ChifUnie St t sD' 1tJ e e td ae c udg

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?