Henderson v. General Revenue Corporation

Filing 107

ORDER granting 93 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint, and deeming second amended complaint filed as of this date and docketed separately by the Clerk; administratively terminating 58 Motion to Certify Class by the Clerk, and whatever else as set forth in the order. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 3/21/19. (sas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION WILLIE HENDERSON, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL REVENUE CORPORATION, et al. , Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7: 17CV00292 ORDER By: Hon. Glen E. Conrad Senior United States District Judge For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 93) is GRANTED; 2. The second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 93-1) shall be deemed filed as of this date and docketed separately by the Clerk; 3. The plaintiff shall file an amended motion for class certification reflecting Navient Portfolio Management, LLC as an additional defendant within five (5) days ; 4. The parties shall confer and submit a proposed briefing schedule on the amended motion for class certification within ten ( 10) days; 5. Upon receipt of the proposed briefing schedule, the court will finalize the hearing date for the amended motion for class certification; and 6. The original motion for class certification (Dkt. No. 58) shall be administratively terminated by the Clerk. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record. DATED: This oU ~ay ofMarch, 2019. Senior United States District Judge Case 7:17-cv-00292-GEC Document 107 Filed 03/21/19 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 831

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?