Boggs v. Mediko et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/5/2017. (slt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U. . DI COURI S CE S ST. AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED 02T 26 2 1 7 I THE I NI N J TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F W R GI I CT N A R OANOKE DI SI W ON JEREM Y M I AEL BOGG S, CH J u B; Y . u x cu j s U Ci lAc i No.7: 7- v- 37 vi tpn 1 c 00 2 Pl ntf ai it M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI V. M EDI ,e aI, KO t . By: D ef endant . s , H o M ihae F.Urbansd n. c l l C hi fU ni e St esD i t i tJudge e t d at src J r m y M ihae Boggs aVigi ai aepr e ngpr K ,fl d aci lrgh sc ee c l , r ni nm t oc edi o e vi i t ompli ant . pls a t o4 U. C. 1 8 .Plitf na sM e i a LalaSl r a d fnd n s t u n t 2 S. j 9 3 an if me dko nd t l r r mme s s e e a t. Howe r Pli tf doe no des rbea pe s la to o ison by a de e nt Seci n ve , a n if s t c i ny r ona c r m s i ny f nda . to 1 3 r quie as 98 e r s howi ofpe s lf ul on t pa tofade e ng r ona a t he r f ndanteihe ba e on t t r s d he de e ntspe s f nda ' r onalc onduc ora he ' co uc i e c i oft de e ntspolcesor t not rs nd t n xe uton he f nda ' i i c t m s Fi he v.W a hi o M e r Ar Tr nstA u hor 6 0F. 11 3 1 4 - 3(t Ci. us o . s r s nl n t o. ea a i t ., 9 2d 3 , 1 2 4 4 h r - 1 2 , b o ae p oh rg o n sk Cn y o Ri ri ev M c u hi 5 0U. . 4( 9 ) 98 ) a r g t d . t e r u d y t . f vesd . La c l 0 S 4 1 91. q n, Ac o dn l t ec u t imis stec mpan wi u p eudc , t s a tt 28U. C. c r igy,h o r ds se h o lit t t rj ie pl u n o ho r S. j1 5 b ( ) f rfiigt saeacam u o wh c rle ma beg a td TheClr wil 91 A( )1, o al o tt li p n ih eif y rn e . n ek l c os t c e and Pl i ifi gr nt d l a off te da t fl a n nde co antt t l e he ms , antf s a e e ve oure n ys o ie n me d mpl i ha sa e aplusbl cai upo wli hr le ma beg a ed. tts a i e l m n zc ei f y r nt ENTER: hsX T i. - da ofOc obe ,201 y t r 7. 4y . . zm. . . y ( Chi U nie St t ef t d a j zz ..y it tJ s dc udge K

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?