Patterson v. Pinchback et al
Filing
14
OPINION Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 7/9/2018. (slt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MARCUS DUVALL PATTERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
C. PINCHBACK, ET AL.,
Defendants.
Case No. 7:18CV00123
OPINION
By: James P. Jones
United States District Judge
Marcus Duvall Patterson, Pro Se Plaintiff.
The plaintiff, Marcus Duvall Patterson, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se,
has filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that during his
two-year incarceration at the Danville City Jail, his inmate account balance has
been wrong on several occasions, and monies wrongfully deducted were only
refunded to him on one occasion. By Order entered June 12, 2018, the court
advised Patterson that his Complaint was deficient because it did “not present
specific facts about the particular alleged accounting errors (dates, amounts, etc.)
or about his attempts to have each of these errors corrected,” and did not “state
personal actions undertaken by each of the defendants in violation of Patterson’s
rights.” Order 1, ECF No. 13.
The time period granted for Patterson to submit an Amended Complaint
correcting the noted deficiencies has elapsed, and he has not responded. For the
reasons stated in the court’s prior order, I conclude that Patterson’s Complaint fails
to state any actionable § 1983 claim against the defendants he has named. See
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 (2009) (“[A] plaintiff must plead that each
Government-official defendant, through the official’s own individual actions, has
violated the Constitution”). Therefore, I will dismiss the Complaint pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1) and close the action. 1
A separate Final Order will be entered herewith.
DATED: July 9, 2018
/s/ James P. Jones
United States District Judge
1
Under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1), a court may summarily dismiss any prisonerfiled civil action concerning prison conditions “if the court is satisfied that the action
“fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
‐2‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?