Allee v. Streeval et al

Filing 47

OPINION and ORDER denying 40 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 11/17/2021. (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)

Download PDF
Case 7:21-cv-00088-JPJ-PMS Document 47 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 2 Pageid#: 350 USMSIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION JUSTIN J. ALLEE, Plaintiff, v. STREEVAL, ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:21CV00088 OPINION AND ORDER JUDGE JAMES P. JONES Justin J. Allee, Pro Se Plaintiff. The plaintiff, Justin Allee, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging numerous and unrelated claims concerning alleged events at the United States Penitentiary Lee (“USP Lee”). By separate Order, the court has directed him to file a Third Amended Complaint to correct noted deficiencies in this case or face its dismissal. I previously also denied Allee’s separate request for interlocutory injunctive relief. Allee v. Streeval, No. 7:21CV00088, 2021 WL 2784555 (W.D. Va. July 2, 2021). In that motion, Allee asked the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service (“USMS”) to investigate whenever he failed to answer a court order to be sure he was not being tortured. I found that this motion was built on mere speculation and failed to show any likelihood of success on the merits. Id. at 1. Case 7:21-cv-00088-JPJ-PMS Document 47 Filed 11/17/21 Page 2 of 2 Pageid#: 351 Allee has moved for reconsideration of this ruling. His motion presents entirely new allegations about Allee’s problems in federal prison: legal mail not properly marked, a captain and his wife being escorted away from the prison by the USMS, statements by other inmates who claim to have overheard officers admitting to planting a weapon in Allee’s cell, and alleged denial of disciplinary appeal forms. Now, Allee wants me to order his removal from USP Lee. Because the motion does not identify any error in my prior ruling, it is ORDERED that the motion, ECF No. 40, seeking reconsideration of the Order denying Allee’s motion for interlocutory relief, is DENIED. ENTER: November 17, 2021 /s/ JAMES P. JONES Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?