Rodney-Tyler v. Mnuchin et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/3/2021. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
STEPHAN RODNEY-TYLER,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 7:21-cv-00257
MEMORANDUM OPINION
v.
By: Michael F. Urbanski
Chief United States District Judge
STEVEN MNUCHIN, et al,
Defendant(s),
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). By order entered
May 3, 2021, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the order a
statement of assets, an inmate account form, and a certified copy of plaintiff’s trust fund account
statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained
from the appropriate prison official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined during
that six-month period. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of
this action without prejudice.
More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described
conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case
from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once
plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying
Order to plaintiff.
3rd
ENTER: This _____ day of June, 2021.
Michael F. Urbanski
Chief U.S. District
Judge
2021.06.03 17:23:54
-04'00'
__________________________________
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?