Holloman v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/18/2022. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)

Download PDF
Case 7:22-cv-00585-MFU-JCH Document 5 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION ERVIN LAMONTE HOLLOMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00585 MEMORANDUM OPINION v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al , Defendant(s), By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. By order entered October 13, 2022, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the order an inmate account form, and a certified copy of plaintiff’s trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate prison official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined during that six-month period. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. ENTER: This 18th day of November, 2022. Digitally signed by Michael F. Urbanski Chief U.S. District Judge Date: 2022.11.18 15:35:12 -05'00' __________________________________ Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?