Colley v. Cox
Filing
7
OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/22/2024. (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
$-&3,h40''*$&64%*45$0635
"530"/0,&
7"
'*-&%
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROANOKE DIVISION
October 23, 2024
-"63"""645*/
$-&3,
#:
JASON COLLEY,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 7:23 -cv-00516
v.
OPINION and ORDER
DAVID COX,
Defendant(s).
By:
s/5. 5BZMPS
%&165:$-&3,
Robert S. Ballou
United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, while
incarcerated. By its Order entered August 15, 2023, the court advised plaintiff that a failure to update
his mailing address after a transfer or release from incarceration would result in dismissal of this action.
The court’s mail to plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable, and plaintiff has not contacted
the court since August 21, 2023. Plaintiff failed to comply with the court’s Order requiring plaintiff to
maintain an accurate mailing address. Therefore, the court finds that plaintiff failed to prosecute this
action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), by not complying with the court’s August 15,
2023, Order. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 96 (4th Cir. 1989) (stating pro se litigants are subject
to time requirements and respect for court orders and dismissal is an appropriate sanction for noncompliance); Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 340-41 (3d Cir. 1982) (recognizing
a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). Accordingly, this
action is DISMISSED without prejudice and this matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of this
court.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the plaintiff.
Enter: October 22, 2024
/s/ Robert S. Ballou
Robert S. Ballou
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?