King v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING ATTORNEY FEES. Denying as moot 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
4
STEFANIE KING,
No. 1:14-CV-3168-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND GRANTING
ATTORNEY FEES
9
Defendant.
10
11
Before the Court, without oral argument, is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
12
Judgment, ECF No. 13, and Motion for Attorney fees, ECF No. 21. The parties
13
have previously stipulated to reverse and remand for further administrative
14
proceedings, ECF No. 18, and the Court issued an Order of Remand, ECF No.
15
19.
16
grated. Plaintiff now properly request reasonable attorney fees pursuant to the
17
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. '2412(d) (hereinafter “EAJA”). The Court
18
has reviewed the itemized billing and documentation submitted by Plaintiff and
19
finds the attorney fees reasonable. Having reviewed the pleadings and the file in
20
this matter, the Court is fully informed and DENIES AS MOOT the Motion for
In its stipulation, the parties agreed that reasonable attorney fees should be
ORDER - 1
1
Summary Judgement, ECF No. 13, and GRANTS the Motion for Attorney Fees,
2
ECF No. 21.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
4
1.
DENIED AS MOOT; and
5
6
2.
9
10
Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA, ECF No.
21, is GRANTED in the amount of $6,165.24.
7
8
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement, ECF No. 13, is
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order
and provide copies to all counsel.
DATED this 14TH day of April 2016.
11
__________________________
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?