Trudeau v. Colvin
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation regarding 24 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle. (CC, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
7 PREMO TRUDEAU,
No. 15-CV-3114-FVS
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
10 CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
11 Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
12
ECF Nos. 14, 17, 24
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation issued by
Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke on December 14, 2016, ECF No. 24,
recommending Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, be denied
and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17, be granted. No
objection was filed. After review, the Court hereby adopts the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1
1
1.
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 24, is ADOPTED in its
2 entirety.
3
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 14, is DENIED.
4
3.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17, is
5 GRANTED.
6
The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and forward copies
7 to the parties. Judgment shall be entered for Defendant and the file shall be
8 CLOSED.
9
10
11
DATED January 3, 2017.
s/Fred Van Sickle
Fred Van Sickle
Senior United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?