Cascade Natural Gas Corporation v. International Chemical Workers Union Council/UFCW Local 121-C

Filing 75

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of International Chemical Workers Union Council/UFCW Local 121-C against Cascade Natural Gas Corporation. (TR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Case 1:16-cv-03163-SMJ ECF No. 75 filed 06/26/20 PageID.1477 Page 1 of 1 AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON for the_ Eastern District of Washington Jun 26, 2020 CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff v. INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION COUNCIL/UFCW LOCAL 121-C, ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-3163-SMJ Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 73, is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and to Remand Remaining Damage Issues to Arbitrator, ECF No. 59, is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion to Strike, ECF No. 66, is DENIED AS MOOT. This matter is REMANDED to the Arbitrator for resolution of remaining issues regarding damages. Judgment entered for Defendant. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision ’ decided by Judge on a motion for summary judgment and to remand. Date: 6/26/2020 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Tonia Ramirez (By) Deputy Clerk Tonia Ramirez

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?