Cascade Natural Gas Corporation v. International Chemical Workers Union Council/UFCW Local 121-C
Filing
75
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of International Chemical Workers Union Council/UFCW Local 121-C against Cascade Natural Gas Corporation. (TR, Case Administrator)
Case 1:16-cv-03163-SMJ
ECF No. 75
filed 06/26/20
PageID.1477 Page 1 of 1
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
Jun 26, 2020
CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION,
a Washington Corporation,
Plaintiff
v.
INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION
COUNCIL/UFCW LOCAL 121-C,
)
)
)
)
)
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-3163-SMJ
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 73, is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, and to Remand Remaining Damage Issues to Arbitrator, ECF No. 59, is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion to
Strike, ECF No. 66, is DENIED AS MOOT. This matter is REMANDED to the Arbitrator for resolution of remaining
issues regarding damages. Judgment entered for Defendant.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
’ decided by Judge
on a motion for
summary judgment and to remand.
Date: 6/26/2020
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Tonia Ramirez
(By) Deputy Clerk
Tonia Ramirez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?