Cantu v. Yakima County et al
Filing
21
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Judgment entered in favor of defendants. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
DAMIAN GARZA CANTU,
Plaintiff
v.
YAKIMA COUNTY, JOSEPH BRUSIC, PATRICIA
POWERS, CARL MUNSON, & UNKNOWN
INDIVIDUALS,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:16-CV-3206-TOR
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other:
Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED in
favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and DENIED as moot as to Plaintiff’s
remaining state law claims; and Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Judgment is entered for Defendants.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
’ decided by Judge
Date:
July 28, 2017
without a jury and the above decision
THOMAS O. RICE
on a motion to dismiss ECF No. 17.
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Linda L. Hansen
(By) Deputy Clerk
Linda L. Hansen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?