Hellums v. Campbell et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT. The Report and Recommendation ECF No. 9 is ADOPTED in its entirety. The complaint, ECF No. 7, is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gran ted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status is revoked. Plaintiff Warned Re 28:USC 1915(g) - The court certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
JOSHUA A. HELLUMS,
NO: 1:17-CV-3138-TOR
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT
v.
EDWARD CAMPBELL,
CHRISTOPHER MEQUET, SHANE
ANDERSON and BARBERA BARTZ,
1915(g)
Defendants.
13
BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge Dimke’s Report and
14
Recommendation to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which
15
relief may be granted. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Yakima County
16
Jail, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis; Defendants have not been served.
17
Plaintiff has filed no objections.
18
By Order filed November 8, 2017, Plaintiff was advised of the deficiencies of
19
his complaint and directed to amend or voluntarily dismiss within sixty (60) days.
20
ECF No. 8. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to show Defendant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT --1
1
Campbell was aware of constitutional violations or that any alleged violations were
2
caused by a custom or policy he established. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th
3
Cir. 1989); see also Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Vill., 723 F.2d 675,
4
680 (9th Cir. 1984); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 2011) (a supervisor
5
can only be held liable for his or her own culpable action or inaction). Plaintiff also
6
failed to state facts showing deliberately indifferent to his serious medical or mental
7
health needs. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837, 846 (1994).
8
Although cautioned that failure to amend to state a claim upon which relief
9
may be granted would result in the dismissal of the complaint and a “strike” under
10
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff did not amend and has filed nothing further in this
11
action.
12
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), enacted April 26, 1996, a prisoner who
13
brings three or more civil actions or appeals which are dismissed as frivolous or for
14
failure to state a claim will be precluded from bringing any other civil action or
15
appeal in forma pauperis “unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious
16
physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff is advised to read the statutory
17
provisions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint may
18
count as one of the three dismissals allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and may
19
adversely affect his ability to file future claims.
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT --2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, is ADOPTED in its entirety.
3
2. The complaint, ECF No. 7, is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state
4
a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and
5
1915A(b)(1).
6
3. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is revoked.
7
4. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this
8
Order would not be taken in good faith.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order,
10
enter judgment, provide copies to Plaintiff at his last known address, and CLOSE
11
the file. The Clerk of Court is further directed to forward a copy of this Order to
12
the Office of the Attorney General of Washington, Corrections Division.
13
DATED February 13, 2018.
14
15
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT --3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?