Cheesman v. Ellensburg, City of et al

Filing 41

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES - All future pleadings shall be filed under Case No. 1:18-cv-03017-SAB, unless the Court directs otherwise. Case No. 1:18-cv-03216-SAB shall be administratively closed. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 2 Aug 27, 2019 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 ROY D. CHEESMAN, No. 1:18-cv-03017-SAB Plaintiff, No. 1:18-cv-03216-SAB 9 10 v. 11 DETECTIVE JENNIFER MARGHEIM, 12 CORPORAL JASON BRUNK, and 13 OFFICER LUCAS ANDERSON, 14 Defendants. 15 16 RUTH ANN CONDE CHEESMAN, 17 Plaintiff, 18 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES v. 19 CITY OF ELLENSBURG; 20 ELLENSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT 21 DETECTIVE JENNIFER MARGHEIM; 22 JIM WEED; 23 Defendants. 24 25 Previously, the Court ordered the parties to show cause as to why these two 26 cases should not be consolidated. The Court has reviewed the parties’ responses 27 and has determined that it is appropriate to consolidate these two cases under Fed. 28 R. Civ. P. 42(a). ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES ~ 1 1 // 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 3 1. The above-captioned cases, No. 1:18-cv-03017-SAB and No. 1:18-cv- 4 03216-SAB, are consolidated. 5 2. All future pleadings shall be filed under Case No. 1:18-cv-03017-SAB, 6 unless the Court directs otherwise. Case No. 1:18-cv-03216-SAB shall be 7 administratively closed. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order 9 and forward copies to Plaintiffs and counsel. 10 DATED this 27th day of August 2019. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?