Doten v. Saul

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; granting ECF No. 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Case is Closed. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 2 Aug 01, 2022 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 CANDACE D., No. 1:19-CV-03233-SAB Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL AND RECOMMENDATION OF 12 SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. 13 14 15 16 On July 14, 2022, Magistrate Judge Alexander Eckstrom issued a Report 17 and Recommendation that Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees 18 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) be granted. ECF No. 28. 19 No timely objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 21 1. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Eckstrom’s Report and 22 Recommendation, ECF No. 28, in its entirety. 23 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 24 U.S.C. § 406(b), ECF No. 21, is GRANTED. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ~ 1 1 3. Section 406(b) attorney fees should be paid to Mr. Tree in the amount of 2 $14,332.00. Plaintiff is due an offset of $7,430.05 for previously paid EAJA fees, 3 leaving a net attorney fee due Mr. Tree of $6,901.95. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to 5 file this Order, provide copies to counsel, and close the file. 6 DATED this 1st day of August 2022. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stanley A. Bastian Chief United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?