Strocsher v. Saul

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ECF No. 21 and striking as moot ECF No. 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. File closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (PH, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-03049-JTR ECF No. 22 filed 02/17/21 PageID.2685 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 6 7 ELIZABETH S., 10 11 12 v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK No. 1:20-CV-3049-JTR 8 9 Feb 17, 2021 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Defendant. 14 15 BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ stipulated motion to remand the 16 above-captioned matter to the Commissioner for additional administrative 17 proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF No. 21. 18 Attorney D. James Tree represents Plaintiff; Special Assistant United States 19 Attorney Katherine B. Watson represents Defendant. The parties have consented 20 to proceed before a magistrate judge. ECF No. 6. After considering the file and 21 proposed order, IT IS ORDERED: 22 1. The parties’ Stipulated Motion for Remand, ECF No. 21, is 23 GRANTED. The above-captioned case is REVERSED and REMANDED to the 24 Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to 25 sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 26 On remand, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will not disturb the 27 partially favorable portion of the prior decision which found Plaintiff disabled as of 28 August 27, 2014. With respect to the period from June 1, 2010, the amended ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND - 1 Case 1:20-cv-03049-JTR ECF No. 22 filed 02/17/21 PageID.2686 Page 2 of 2 1 disability onset date, through August 26, 2014, the date prior to the day Plaintiff 2 was found disabled, the ALJ shall offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing 3 and issue a new decision. The ALJ is directed to: (1) reevaluate the medical 4 opinion evidence; (2) reconsider Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity for that 5 period; and (3) obtain vocational expert evidence, if warranted. 6 2. Judgment shall be entered for PLAINTIFF. 7 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 16, is 8 STRICKEN AS MOOT. 9 4. 10 motion. 11 12 13 An application for attorney fees and costs may be filed by separate The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, forward copies to counsel, and CLOSE THE FILE. DATED February 17, 2021. 14 15 16 _____________________________________ JOHN T. RODGERS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?