Vorgias v. Community Health of Central Washington

Filing 16

ORDER DENYING 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 2 Jul 15, 2021 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 DEMETRIOS VORGIAS, Plaintiff, 9 No. 1:21-CV-03013-SAB v. 10 11 COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL ORDER DENYING 12 WASHINGTON, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Defendant. 13 ORDER 14 15 Before the Court is the parties’ Proposed Stipulated Protective Order, ECF 16 No. 14. The stipulation was considered without oral argument. 17 The parties ask the Court to sign a Protective Order that was drafted and 18 agreed to by the parties. It is this Court’s practice to not enter general Protective 19 Orders that simply set forth the parties’ agreement for handling “confidential” 20 materials. 21 The parties are free to contract between themselves regarding disclosure of 22 information produced in discovery and pursue appropriate remedies in the event of 23 breach; however, the Court will not be party to such an agreement. If, in the future, 24 the parties wish to file specific items of discovery in the court record and protect 25 such items from public access, the Court will entertain an application for a 26 narrowly tailored protective order. 27 // 28 // ORDER DENYING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER # 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. The parties’ Proposed Stipulated Protective Order, ECF No. 14, is 3 DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to file 5 this Order and provide copies to counsel. 6 DATED this 15th day of July 2021. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stanley A. Bastian Chief United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER # 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?