In Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation

Filing 3408

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; granting 3396 Agreed Motion to Dismiss. Parties Elliott Lenhard Burley (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Helen Burley (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Carol Byers (Jaros Plaintiff, Est ate of ), Marianne Collins (Jaros Plaintiff), Jack Dillon (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Verland Fleshman (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Mary Ella Hill (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Nathan J Hoffer (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Kathryn Johnson (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Richard Kepplin (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Kent Kilby (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Donna L Kinman (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Thomas McGuire (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Melva McKinnis (Jaros Plaintiff , Estate of ), Maurice Miner (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Claude H Outland (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Dorothy Peterson (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Ronald Eugene E Peterson (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Catherine W Russell (Jaros Plaint iff, Estate of ), LaVelle Sherman (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Richard Alan Smith (Jaros Plaintiff ), Ruth Smith (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Gerald Sybertz (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Marilyn Uhalde (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Gertrud e Urlacher (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Howard West (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Guy F Willis (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Marylou Wilson (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), Harry E Winston (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ), James S Bronson, Sr (J aros Plaintiff, Estate of) and Lula Brooks (Jaros Plaintiff, Estate of ) are Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Fremming Nielsen. (cc: Corrinalyn and Robert Guyette, Richelle A. Hendrix, Martha J. McNeely electronically at mjmcneely@netzero.net, Frederick W. Nelson, Katherine N. Plager, Elaine Maria Rey, Beverly M. Utz, and Noreen L. Wynne) (LE, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 IN RE HANFORD NUCLEAR 7 RESERVATION LITIGATION, 8 No. CV-91-3015-WFN ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE 9 10 11 12 13 This matter having come before the Court on the parties' agreed Motion, and after due consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' Agreed Motion to Dismiss, filed December 9, 14 2013, ECF No. 3396, is GRANTED. 15 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: The claims of the following Plaintiffs are 16 Estate of James S Bronson, Sr Estate of Donna L. Kinman 17 Estate of Lula Brooks Estate of Thomas McGuire 18 Estate of Elliott Lenhard Burley Estate of Melva McKinnis 19 Estate of Helen Burley Estate of Maurice Miner 20 Estate of Carol Byers Estate of Claude H. Outland 21 Marianne Collins Estate of Dorothy Peterson 22 Estate of Jack Dillon Estate of Ronald Eugene Peterson 23 Estate of Verland Fleshman Estate of Catherine W. Russell 24 Estate of Mary Ella Hill Estate of LaVelle Sherman 25 Estate of Nathan J. Hoffer Richard Alan Smith 26 Estate of Kathryn Johnson Estate of Ruth Smith 27 Estate of Richard Kepplin Estate of Gerald Sybertz 28 Estate of Kent Kilby Estate of Marilyn Uhalde ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE - 1 1 Estate of Gertrude Urlacher Estate of Marylou Wilson 2 Estate of Howard West Estate of Harry E. Winston 3 Estate of Guy F. Willis 4 The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and provide copies to 5 counsel; Mediator Gary Bloom; AND TO pro se Plaintiffs Corrinalyn and Robert Guyette, 6 Richelle A. Hendrix, Martha J. McNeely, Frederick W. Nelson, Katherine N. Plager, 7 Elaine Maria Rey, Beverly M. Utz, and Noreen L. Wynne. 8 DATED this 18th day of December, 2013. 9 10 11 12-18-13-4 s/ Wm. Fremming Nielsen WM. FREMMING NIELSEN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?