Barrier, et al v. City of Airway, et al

Filing 83

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Justin L. Quackenbush. (VJ, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Barrier, et al v. City of Airway, et al Doc. 83 Case 2:99-cv-00240-JLQ Document 83 Filed 09/05/2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JOHN BARRIER, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF AIRWAY HEIGHTS, et al., Defendants. BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant's Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute, filed on August 3, 2006. (Ct. Rec. 78). Prior to this motion, nothing had been filed in this matter since September 18, 2002. Local Rule 41.1(b) states the following: In any civil case in which no action of record has been taken by the parties for the preceding one year the court or a party shall note the case for dismissal and give thirty (30) days' notice to counsel of record. If no action of record is taken in the meantime, and no satisfactory explanation of nonaction is submitted, an order of dismissal without prejudice will be entered by the Court on the date the case is noted for hearing. Pursuant to Local Rule 41.1(b), Plaintiff's failure to respond to the Motion, and the Declaration of Jennifer C. Underwood, (Ct. Rec. 82) wherein she states that Robert Dunn, counsel of record for the Plaintiffs, indicated that he would not oppose dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's complaints and the claims therein be and the same are hereby Dismissed Without Prejudice. The Clerk of this court shall enter this Order, enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice, forward copies to counsel, and close this file. DATED this 5th day of September 2006. s/ Justin L. Quackenbush JUSTIN L. QUACKENBUSH SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NO. CV-99-0240-JLQ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?