Dunn & Black PS v. USA, et al

Filing 117

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND CLOSING FILE. Signed by Judge Lonny R. Suko. (CV, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Dunn & Black PS v. USA, et al Doc. 117 Case 2:04-cv-00229-LRS Document 117 Filed 09/11/2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -vs8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On February 25, 2005, this Court entered an order denying Plaintiff Dunn and Black P.S.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Intervenors' Motion for Declaratory Judgment; and finding as moot Intervenors' Alternative Motion for Stay. (Ct. Rec. 78). On March THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and ENVIRONMENTAL RECLAMATION, INC., an Idaho corporation; and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, Defendants. ----------------------------------FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, and AMERICAN GUARANTY & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Intervenors. DUNN & BLACK, P.S., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV-04-0229-LRS ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND CLOSING FILE 23, 2005, Plaintiff Dunn and Black filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, appealing the Order of February 25, 2005. On September 10, 2007, the Court received a Mandate from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ct. Rec. 116). ORDER - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00229-LRS Document 117 Filed 09/11/2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby DIRECTED to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and close this file. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is DIRECTED to file this Order, and provide copies to counsel. DATED this 11th day of September, 2007. s/Lonny R. Suko 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LONNY R. SUKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?